|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 1, 215-222, Copyright © 1969 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
1 Department of Veterinary Physiology, University of Sydney,
Sydney, N.S.W. 2006, Australia Characteristics of adenosinetriphosphatase of ejaculated spermatozoa from three rams
have been studied. Ram spermatozoa were found to hydrolyse ATP in preference to
ADP as evidenced by the insignificant amounts of AMP recovered from the incubation
medium containing both ATP and ADP as substrates. However, ram spermatozoa could
dephosphorylate ADP alone at a 20% lower rate than ATP. With ATP as substrate the
Km was 3.6 x 1O-4 and inhibition was observed when the substrate concentration exceeded that of magnesium; this was attributed to possible binding of free ATP without
splitting at the active sites. The magnesium dependent ATPase activity of sperm tails, isolated by ultrasonic
disintegration and fractional centrifugation, was stimulated by sodium and potassium
more at 25-36 C than at 5-25 C presumably as a result of alterations in the configuration of the enzyme. However, above 36 C or after preincubation at 45 C monovalent
cations inhibited the magnesium dependent ATPase activity which was ascribed to
alterations of the liquid-crystalline structure of lipids associated with the enzyme. The ATPase activity of whole sperm increased with total cation concentrations of up
to 30 mM but was depressed by 100 mM. Magnesium was a less efficient activator than
calcium. The pH optimum of divalent cation activated ATPase of isolated sperm tails in the
presence of 0.1 M KCl was about 8.0. When the KCl concentration was increased to
0.5 M and 1.0 M the ATPase activity was markedly reduced and the pH optimum
shifted to 7.2. Under these conditions, activation of the enzyme appeared to be dependent on the total divalent cation concentration rather than the nature of the cation.
In view of these and other observations it is suggested that divalent cations modify the
environment of the active centres by occupying fixed binding sites which may then
influence orientation of the substrate on the enzyme.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |