|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 10, 111-115, Copyright © 1974 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada and Department of Physiology,
University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada The ability of prolactin and progesterone to inhibit ovulation was utilized to investigate
the relationship between ovulation and luteolysis. The first estrus and ovulation were synchronized in 27-day-old, prepubertal rats by the subcutaneous (sc) administration of
4 IU of pregnant mane serum gonadotropin (PMS). Pseudopregnancy was induced by
the sc administration of prolactin (100 µg, NIH-P-B2 administered twice daily) beginning
on the day of ovulation (Day 0) and maintained through Day 2. If prolactin therapy
was discontinued on Day 2, a second injection of PMS on Day 3 resulted in ovulation
accompanied by involution of the original corpora lutea. Continuous prolactin treatment
from Day 0 through Day 6 not only prevented ovulation as a result of PMS administration
on Day 3, but prevented luteolysis as well. Progesterone (8 mg/day), if administered
on Days 3 through 6, inhibited ovulation in response to PMS administered on Day 3.
It did not, however, prevent the luteolysis as a result of the ovulatory stimulus provided
by PMS. Progesterone, in the absence of PMS, did not affect luteal weight. The dissociation
of luteolysis from ovulation demonstrated that actual ovulation was not a requirement
for luteolysis to occur, but leaves open the possibility that an ovulatory stimulus may
be an effective luteolytic stimulus.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |