Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HIXON, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by ARMSTRONG, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HIXON, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by ARMSTRONG, D. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by HIXON, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by ARMSTRONG, D. T.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 10, 111-115, Copyright © 1974 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Association Between Pregnant Mare Serum-Induced Ovulation and Luteolysis in Rats and its Dissociation by Progesterone Treatment

J. E. HIXON 1, and D. T. ARMSTRONG 1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada and Department of Physiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada


The ability of prolactin and progesterone to inhibit ovulation was utilized to investigate the relationship between ovulation and luteolysis. The first estrus and ovulation were synchronized in 27-day-old, prepubertal rats by the subcutaneous (sc) administration of 4 IU of pregnant mane serum gonadotropin (PMS). Pseudopregnancy was induced by the sc administration of prolactin (100 µg, NIH-P-B2 administered twice daily) beginning on the day of ovulation (Day 0) and maintained through Day 2. If prolactin therapy was discontinued on Day 2, a second injection of PMS on Day 3 resulted in ovulation accompanied by involution of the original corpora lutea. Continuous prolactin treatment from Day 0 through Day 6 not only prevented ovulation as a result of PMS administration on Day 3, but prevented luteolysis as well. Progesterone (8 mg/day), if administered on Days 3 through 6, inhibited ovulation in response to PMS administered on Day 3. It did not, however, prevent the luteolysis as a result of the ovulatory stimulus provided by PMS. Progesterone, in the absence of PMS, did not affect luteal weight. The dissociation of luteolysis from ovulation demonstrated that actual ovulation was not a requirement for luteolysis to occur, but leaves open the possibility that an ovulatory stimulus may be an effective luteolytic stimulus.

Accepted on July 23, 1973







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.