Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PARR, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by PARR, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PARR, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by PARR, E. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by PARR, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by PARR, E. L.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 11, 220-233, Copyright © 1974 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Uterine Luminal Epithelium: Protrusions Mediate Endocytosis, not Apocrine Secretion, in the Rat

MARGARET B. PARR 1, and EARL L. PARR 1

1 Laboratories of Human Reproduction and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, 45 Shattuck Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115


The uteri of 44 female rats on Day 5 of pregnancy were subjected to histological study using 18 different fixation procedures. Irregular protrusions from the apical surface of luminal epithelial cells were observed with every fixation procedure, indicating that such surface specializations are not a fixation artifact. A study of the reabsorption of ferritin from the uterine lumen of four rats on Day 5 of pregnancy showed that the apical protrusions were involved in the formation of 0.5-3 µm endocytosis vacuoles. Tracer was taken into these vacuoles within 10-20 min, and by 60 min it was found mostly in multivesicular and dense bodies. The apical protrusions carried out endocytosis only on Days 4 and 5 of pregnancy; on Days 1, 2, and 6 this activity was minimal or absent. In addition to the 0.5-3 µm vacuoles, endocytosis on Day 5 of pregnancy was also carried out by 100 nm coated vesicles.

There was no evidence that the apical protrusions of luminal epithelial cells or the dome-shaped bulges of glandular epithelial cells pinched off and constituted an apocrine secretion. We conclude that preimplantation rat embryos are not nourished by an apocrine secretory process, but that endocytosis may, in some way, be involved in their maintenance.

Accepted on March 5, 1974




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C.E. Quinn and R.F. Casper
Pinopodes: a questionable role in endometrial receptivity
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 8, 2008; (2008) dmn052v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. J Kimber
Leukaemia inhibitory factor in implantation and uterine biology
Reproduction, August 1, 2005; 130(2): 131 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. Stavreus-Evers, L. Aghajanova, H. Brismar, H. Eriksson, B.-M. Landgren, and O. Hovatta
Co-existence of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and pinopodes in human endometrium at the time of implantation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 765 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.M. Adams, N. Gayer, M.J. Hosie, and C.R. Murphy
Human uterodomes (pinopods) do not display pinocytotic function
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1980 - 1986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. Stavreus-Evers, B. Masironi, B.-M. Landgren, A. Holmgren, H. Eriksson, and L. Sahlin
Immunohistochemical localization of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin in human endometrium: a possible association with pinopodes
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 8(6): 546 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. R. Murphy
Understanding the apical surface markers of uterine receptivity: Pinopods--or uterodomes?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2451 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.