|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 21, 75-87, Copyright © 1979 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
1 Reproduction Research Section,
University of Melbourne,
Parkville, 3052 The binding of [125I]-labeled human follicle stimulating hormone ([125I]-FSH) and chorionic
gonadotropin ([125I]-hCG) to intact ovine follicles was studied in vitro as a function of follicular
diameter and stage of morphological atresia. Histological confirmation of the atretic classification was established and the incidence of
atresia in those follicles studied was variable and directly related to follicular diameter (P<0.01).
The binding of [125I]-hFSH and [125I]-hCG to theca was relatively constant when compared to
the change in granulosa binding that was associated with increased follicular diameter or stage of
atresia. When studied without regard to the stage of atresia, the binding of [125I]-hFSH to granulosa
cells decreased and that of [125I]-hCG increased with increased follicular diameter. These changes
were thought to reflect changes in the relative incidence of atresia within each size group rather
than decreased binding per se. Subsequent analysis of [125I]-labeled gonadotropin binding to
granuhosa cells as a function of both follicular diameter and stage of atresia simultaneously indicated
that the extent of [125I]-hFSH binding was determined solely by stage of atresia rather than
follicular diameter (P<0.05). Conversely, while [125I]-hCG binding was decreased by increased
atresia, the overall extent of binding was determined by follicular diameter (P<0.01). It is concluded that macroscopic assessment of follicular atresia in ovarian follicular populations
is directly related to follicular diameter. In addition, the ability of granulosa cells to bind [125I]-labeled gonadotropins in vitro varies as a function of follicular diameter and stage of atresia.
2 Medical Research Centre,
Prince Henry’s Hospital,
St. Kilda Road,
Melbourne, 3004
3 Monash University,
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Queen Victoria Hospital,
Melbourne, Australia, 3000
Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank Professor D. M. de
Kretser, Department of Anatomy, Monash University
and Dr. A. Lopata, Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, Queen Victoria Hospital, Melbourne for
their assistance in the preparation of photomicrographs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Ozawa, D Tabayashi, T A Latief, T Shimizu, I Oshima, and Y Kanai Alterations in follicular dynamics and steroidogenic abilities induced by heat stress during follicular recruitment in goats Reproduction, May 1, 2005; 129(5): 621 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Logan, J. L. Juengel, and K. P. McNatty Onset of Steroidogenic Enzyme Gene Expression During Ovarian Follicular Development in Sheep Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 906 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Clement, D. Monniaux, J. Stark, K. Hardy, J. C. Thalabard, S. Franks, and D. Claude Mathematical model of FSH-induced cAMP production in ovarian follicles Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2001; 281(1): E35 - E53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kishi and G. S. Greenwald Autoradiographic Analysis of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Receptors in the Ovary of Immature Rats Treated with Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin Biol Reprod, November 1, 1999; 61(5): 1171 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Goudet, F. Belin, J. Bézard, and N. Gérard Intrafollicular Content of Luteinizing Hormone Receptor, {alpha}-Inhibin, and Aromatase in Relation to Follicular Growth, Estrous Cycle Stage, and Oocyte Competence for In Vitro Maturation in the Mare Biol Reprod, May 1, 1999; 60(5): 1120 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Abdennebi, P. Monget, C. Pisselet, J.J. Remy, R. Salesse, and D. Monniaux Comparative Expression of Luteinizing Hormone and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptors in Ovarian Follicles from High and Low Prolific Sheep Breeds Biol Reprod, April 1, 1999; 60(4): 845 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A.A. Fouladi Nashta, D. Waddington, and K.H.S. Campbell Maintenance of Bovine Oocytes in Meiotic Arrest and Subsequent Development In Vitro: A Comparative Evaluation of Antral Follicle Culture with Other Methods Biol Reprod, August 1, 1998; 59(2): 255 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. O. Evans and J. E. Fortune Selection of the Dominant Follicle in Cattle Occurs in the Absence of Differences in the Expression of Messenger Ribonucleic Acid for Gonadotropin Receptors Endocrinology, July 1, 1997; 138(7): 2963 - 2971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |