Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DICKSON, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by EISENFELD, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DICKSON, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by EISENFELD, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DICKSON, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by EISENFELD, A. J.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 21, 1105-1114, Copyright © 1979 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Estrogen Receptor in Liver of Male and Female Rats: Endocrine Regulation and Molecular Properties

ROBERT B. DICKSON 1, and ARNOLD J. EISENFELD 1

1 Department of Pharmacology and Reproductive Biology Section, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510


Estrogen receptors from livers of adult male and female rats were compared. Hepatic cytosol estrogen receptors from both sexes were similar using the criteria of percent of saturation with ammonium sulfate required for precipitation, and isoelectric point (pI) of the receptor. The estrogen receptor from male or female rat liver cytosol was maximally precipitated with ammonium sulfate at 30% of saturation (30% AS ppt). As previously described, demonstration of the estrogen receptor in liver cytosol of male rats required this partial purification step because of the presence of an additional sex hormone binder with unusual properties. The pI of the liver cytosol receptor from females was 6.9. After 30% AS ppt, the p1 of the cytosol receptor from male or female rat livers was 4.7. Liver estrogen receptors from male or female rats had similar affinity (Kd = 1 x 10-10 M), capacity (2 fmoles/mg liver) (confirming previous results) and pattern of binding specificity for active estrogens. The liver cytosol estrogen receptors in both female (confirming previous reports) and male rats were reduced to 10% of control values following hypophysectomy (Hx); the Kd was unaffected. Receptor levels in female rat livers were not substantially restored following treatment with prolactin or growth hormone. Treatment of intact female rats with bromocriptine (a blocker of prolactin secretion) did not change the hepatic cytosol estrogen receptor level. The pituitary factor required for receptor maintenance remains to be elucidated. After gonadectomy (Gx), the liver cytosol from males or females was increased to 150% of control values; the Kd remained unchanged. A gonadal factor appears to regulate receptor levels negatively in the intact animal. The recently described, male-specific, nonreceptor [3H]-E2 binding sites in liver cytosol were reduced to 10% of control values by Hx and to 30% of control values by Gx. The estrogen receptors found in the livers of male and female rats were similar on the basis of physical properties, binding properties for [3H]-E2 and endocrine regulation.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Ms. Sue Losacco for typing the manuscript and Ms. Irene Visintin for technical assistance.

Submitted on July 31, 1979
Accepted on September 26, 1979




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. R. Plowchalk and J. Teeguarden
Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Estradiol in Rats and Humans: A Biologically Motivated Quantitative Framework for Evaluating Responses to Estradiol and Other Endocrine-Active Compounds
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2002; 69(1): 60 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.