|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 22, 297-306, Copyright © 1980 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
1 Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology,
Shrewsbury, Massachusetts 01545 The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of vasectomy (sperm obstruction)
with vasocystostomy (sperm diversion) on the testes and epididymides of rabbits and to correlate
pathologic changes with success or failure of vasovasostomy to restore fertility. Vasovasostomy restored fertility to 36% of rabbits following vasectomy and to 100% of those
in which sperm had been previously diverted by vasocystostomy. Pathologic changes were found in
73% of testes and 42% of epididymides following sperm obstruction, but there were no changes in
the testis and only rare changes in the epididymis following sperm diversion. It is concluded that vasocystostomy is a more physiological form of surgical contraception than
conventional vasectomy in the rabbit.
Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to thank Pathology Associates Laboratory,
Inc. for preparation of the histological material,
Drs. Robert S. Harper and Martin Dym for their
independent interpretations of the microscopic
sections and Drs. J. McCracken, M. C. Chang and C.
Longcope for criticism of the manuscript.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Steger, M. Slavov, K. Failing, W. Weidner, and M. Bergmann Effect of Vasectomy on Sperm Nuclear Chromatin Condensation in the Rabbit J Androl, March 1, 2005; 26(2): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |