Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REIMERS, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by SEIDEL, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by REIMERS, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by SEIDEL, G. E., JR.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by REIMERS, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by SEIDEL, G. E.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 22, 367-375, Copyright © 1980 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Bi-Generational Effects of 6-Mercaptopurine on Reproduction in Mice

T. J. REIMERS 1, P. M. SLUSS 1, J. GOODWIN 1, , and G. E. SEIDEL JR. 1

1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Animal Reproduction Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523


Effects of the mutagenic, immunosuppressive drug 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) on reproductive function were examined in two generations of mice. CD1/CR mice (G0 generation) received either physiological saline (Group A) or 0.5 (Group B), 1.5 (Group C) or 3.0 (Group D) mg/kg 6-MP daily during pregnancy. Three mg/kg/day administered to G0 mice reduced mean litter sizes (P<0.01), whereas the other doses had no effect. The surviving offspring (G1 generation) were paired for breeding with untreated mice an 70 days of age. Although body weights and general appearance were normal, the interval from the day of pairing of G1 females in Group D (4.9 ± 0.6 days) with untreated males to the day of breeding was longer (P<0.01) than for G1 females in Group A (2.7 ± 0.3 days). A smaller percentage of the G1 females was pregnant in Groups C (78.8%, P<0.05) and D (22.2%, P<0.01) than in Group A (100%). Ovaries from G1 females in Group D weighed 2.2 ± 0.8 mg, whereas those from G1 females in Group A weighed 8.6 ± 0.5 mg (P<0.01). Many ovaries in Groups C and D had fewer follicles, oocytes and corpora lutea than did control ovaries. The mean number of G2 fetuses/pregnant G1 female was lower (P<0.01) in Groups C (10.6 ± 0.4) and D (6.5 ± 1.3) than in Group A (13.0 ± 0.4). A large percentage of G2 fetuses in Groups C (25.3 ± 2.7%) and D (41.7 ± 9.1%) were dead; 12.8 ± 2.6% were dead in Group A (P<0.01). Most fetuses died early in gestation. Weights of the live G2 fetuses and placentas were non different among groups. After G1 males were paired with untreated females, 60% and 55.6% of the females were pregnant in Groups C and D, respectively, whereas 100% were pregnant in Group A (P>0.05). Testes from G1 males in Groups C (155.7 ± 18.8 mg) and D (104.2 ± 11.6 mg) weighed less (P<0.01) than testes from G1 males in Group A (258.0 ± 5.5 mg). Many seminiferous tubules in testes of G1 males were devoid of germ cells. The interval from pairing to breeding, litter sizes, percentage of G2 fetuses dead and G2 fetal and placental weights were not affected when G1 males were mated. Our results show that 6-MP not only had direct embryotoxic effects when administered to pregnant mice, but also severely impaired reproductive function of the surviving offspring a full generation after the drug was administered.

Submitted on January 17, 1979
Accepted on October 29, 1979







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.