Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAY, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by BIRNBAUMER, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DAY, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by BIRNBAUMER, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DAY, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by BIRNBAUMER, L.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 22, 791-797, Copyright © 1980 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Effect of Estradiol Withdrawal on Luteal Hormone-Responsive Adenylyl Cyclase and Luteal Function in the Pseudopregnant Rabbit

SHARON L. DAY 1, JOEL ABRAMOWITZ 1, HOWARD J. KIRCHICK 1, , and LUTZ BIRNBAUMER 1

1 Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030


We showed previously that continued administration of high levels of estradiol (E) to pseudopregnant (PSP) rabbits from Day 8 through Day 11 does not affect their serum progesterone levels, but leads to a 75% decrease in the ability of LH to stimulate the adenylyl cyclase enzyme in their corpora lutea (CL). To determine if the deleterious effect of estrogen is readily reversible, we now explored the effect of a 2-day withdrawal or a switch to low levels of E following the 3-day treatment with high E.

From 2200 h of Day 8 through 2200 h of Day 11, PSP rabbits were injected at 12 h intervals with 0.1 ml sesame oil alone (control), or with oil containing either 1.5 µg E (E-1.5) or 15 µg E (E-15). Several animals from each group were killed between 1000-1100 h the following morning (Day 12). The remaining animals were either switched from E-15 or E-1.5 to oil (E-withdrawal), were switched from E-15 to E-1.5, or were maintained on their original E regiments. The final injections were at 0800 h on Day 14 and the animals were killed 2-3 h later. Adenylyl cyclase activities and serum and luteal progesterone levels were determined.

We found that: 1) Withdrawal of E-15 did not reverse the E-15-induced inactivation of the LH-responsive adenylyl cyclase, nor did it alter the isoproterenol-responsive adenylyl cyclase. 2) Withdrawal of E-1.5 had no effect on the degree of hormonal responsiveness of the adenylyl cyclase when compared with control values. 3) E-15 withdrawal but not E-1.5 withdrawal, resulted in a significant decrease in serum and luteal progesterone content, but 4) did not result in a decrease in the weight of the CL within the 48-h time period tested. 5) Switching from E-15 to E-1.5 treatment did not cause a drop in serum progesterone concentrations, but 6) resulted in LH-stimulated cyclase activity, which although somewhat elevated over that found in animals treated with E-15 throughout, was still markedly decreased compared with controls or rabbits treated with E-1.5.

These results suggest that 1) a high dose of estradiol is required to establish a "dependency" on exogenous E in CL of PSP in rabbits; 2) low levels of exogenous E are sufficient to fulfill the requirements imposed by this E "dependent" state; and 3) the establishment of "dependency" on E is associated with the decrease in the LH-responsive adenylyl cyclase, an unphysiological situation. These data provide evidence that while a partial reversal of the suppression of cyclase activity by high levels of estradiol is possible, it proceeds only slowly taking several days to become effective.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Part of this work was supported by NIH grants HD-09581 and HD-07495. We wish to thank Nancy Gammage for efficient secretarial aid in the preparation of this manuscript.

Submitted on February 26, 1979
Accepted on January 28, 1980







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.