Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAHLGREN, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DAHLGREN, B. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DAHLGREN, B. T.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 24, 734-746, Copyright © 1981 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Impact of Different Dietary Protein Contents on Fecundity and Fertility in the Female Guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters)

B. T. DAHLGREN 1

1 Department of Animal Ecology, University of Lund, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden


Individual fecundity and reproductive output (number of ova plus vitellogenic oocytes) were significantly higher in groups of guppies (Poecilia reticulata, Peters) given 72% protein compared with females fed on either 53%, 23%, or 15% protein. Ovum diameter and size of vitellogenic oocytes were significantly larger in females exposed to either 72% or 53% protein than in groups fed on 15% protein. Females living on a 72% protein-rich diet showed a significantly higher total body weight, ovarian length, width, height, gonad volume and weight than groups fed on either 23% or 15% protein. Significantly higher values of these variables were also found among females given 53% protein compared with groups fed on 15% protein. Average gonadosomatic index increased with higher protein amounts. Growth was significantly higher in females ingesting 72% protein than in groups fed on either 42% or 23% protein.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to Professor Per Brinck and Dr. Bo W. Svensson of the Dept. of Animal Ecology, Lund, for advice and reading of the manuscript. I wish to thank Mrs. Ingrid Davoust for linguistic examination and typing of the manuscript.

Submitted on October 6, 1980
Accepted on January 2, 1981







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.