Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KENNEDY, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by POLAKOSKI, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KENNEDY, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by POLAKOSKI, K. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by KENNEDY, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by POLAKOSKI, K. L.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 25, 197-201, Copyright © 1981 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Improved Method for the Preparation and Purification of Boar magr-Acrosin

WILLIAM P. KENNEDY 1, RICHARD F. PARRISH 2, , and KENNETH L. POLAKOSKI 1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
2 Department of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110


Boar magr-acrosin has been prepared and purified in high yield starting with a partially purified preparation of proacrosin. The simple, three step procedure included 1) selective and quantitative conversion of proacrosin into magr-acrosin at pH 8 using excess leupeptin, a highly effective acrosin inhibitor; 2) dissociation of a tightly acrosin-bound protein by denaturation in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride at pH 3; and 3) gel filtration over Sephadex G-100 superfine resin. The enzyme so obtained appeared homogeneous as judged by SDS-polyacrylamide disc gel electrophoresis, and had, under reducing conditions, an apparent molecular weight of 49,000. These methods allowed for the quantitative conversion of proacrosin into magr-acrosin by completely suppressing the conversion of magr-acrosin into lower molecular weight forms. As a consequence, the overall yield of magr-acrosin from proacrosin has been improved 2.5-fold compared with previously reported methods, and sufficient quantities of boar magr-acrosin can now be prepared so that future in vitro characterization studies can be undertaken.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are grateful to Dr. Billy Day for providing the boar semen. Research supported by grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and NIH (HD 12863, HD 09422, and HD 00296).

Submitted on January 5, 1981
Accepted on March 23, 1981







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.