|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 25, 44-55, Copyright © 1981 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
University of Illinois at the Medical Center,
Chicago, Illinois 60680 Guinea pig epididymal spermatozoa were either capacitated only, or capacitated and acrosome-reacted in vitro. The spermatozoa were separated from the supernatant incubation media, the
spermatozoa extracted, and the amount of acrosin, proacrosin, and acrosin inhibitor in the sperm
extracts as well as in the supernatant solutions was measured. A dialyzable factor was present
which inhibited proacrosin activation as well as acrosin activity, although the latter to a lesser
degree, and was partially removed during the acrosome reaction. The total amount of acrosin
(nonzymogen acrosin + proacrosin) in untreated, control spermatozoa was 3 to 5 times that in
mouse and human spermatozoa. A reduction of
50% in the total amount of sperm acrosin
occurred after induction of the acrosome reaction. Whether spermatozoa were untreated, capacitated, or acrosome-reacted,
90% of the acrosin present on the spermatozoa was in proacrosin
form. The loss of acrosin activity after induction of the acrosome reaction was due to its release
into the surrounding medium, and all of the released enzyme was in the nonzymogen acrosin form.
The amount of acrosin released from control spermatozoa kept in buffer, which underwent the
"false" acrosome reaction, was approximately the same as that released from "true" acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. The total amount of acrosin released after induction of the acrosome reaction was never more than about 55% of the original amount present, even if more than 80% of the
spermatozoa had undergone the acrosome reaction. Proacrosin activation apparently does not
occur, or occurs only minimally, during in vitro capacitation of guinea pig spermatozoa, but
approximately half is activated just before, during, or immediately after the spermatozoa show
morphological changes in the acrosome, whether induced by sperm death or capacitation. Approximately the same small amount of acrosin inhibitor was released from capacitated spermatozoa as
from noncapacitated spermatozoa kept in buffer that had undergone the "false" acrosome reaction.
By contrast, a much higher amount of acrosin inhibitor was liberated from capacitated, acrosome-reacted spermatozoa.
Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by NIH grant HD 09868.
We are most grateful to Ms. Sandy Cameron for her
typing efforts.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |