Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOSTER, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOSTER, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by FOSTER, D. L.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 25, 85-92, Copyright © 1981 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Mechanism for Delay of First Ovulation in Lambs Born in the Wrong Season (Fall)

DOUGLAS L. FOSTER 1

1 Reproductive Endocrinology Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109


The influence of season of birth and photoperiod on the mechanism governing initiation of ovulation in lambs was studied. The ages at the decrease in responsiveness to estradiol-feedback inhibition of tonic LH secretion and first ovulation in lambs born out of their normal birth season (fall) was compared with those in lambs born during the normal season of birth (spring). The change in feedback responsiveness was determined from the pattern of circulating LH in ovariectomized lambs treated chronically with estradiol (Silastic implant) from 20 weeks of age. First ovulation was determined from the pattern of serum progesterone in intact lambs. In control lambs born in spring (March) and raised in natural photoperiod, first ovulation occurred at 31 ± 1 (mean ± SEM) weeks of age, about 4-8 weeks after the onset of the breeding season of adults. Lambs born in the fall (October) and reared in natural environment exhibited no evidence of ovulation at 26-35 weeks, ages which in fall-born females are attained during the anestrous season; rather, ovulations were delayed until shortly after the onset of the breeding season when they were 49 ± 1 weeks old. Rearing fall-born lambs in an annual photoperiod similar to that which they would have experienced had they been born in the spring, markedly reduced the delay in onset of cycles. In these females, ovulations were initiated at 35 ± 0.5 weeks. In each of the three groups, the decrease in responsiveness to negative feedback, as reflected by the increase in serum LH in estradiol-treated lambs, occurred at the time ovulations began in intact females. Relative to spring-born lambs, it was delayed in fall-born lambs under natural environment and was restored to near normal in fall-born lambs under reversed photoperiod.

The results lead to the hypothesis that the delay in onset of ovulation in lambs born out of season (fall) is due to a photoperiod-induced delay of the decrease in responsiveness to estradiol inhibition of tonic LH secretion. When viewed in the context of mechanisms governing sexual maturation in the spring-born lamb and seasonal breeding in the adult, two conceptually different explanations emerge to account for the delay in fall-born lambs: 1) development is retarded by photoperiodic cues, and delayed onset of cyclicity reflects late sexual maturity; 2) development is not retarded; instead photoperiod induces seasonal anestrus at sexual maturity and the onset of cyclicity simply reflects the onset of a breeding season.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The assistance of several colleagues is gratefully acknowledged, especially that of Drs. Kathleen D. Ryan, Fred J. Karsch, Robert L. Goodman, and Eric L. Bittman for their constructive criticism of the design of the study and interpretation of results and Drs. Gordon D. Niswender and Leo E. Reichert for providing reagents used for radioimmunoassay. Valuable technical assistance was given by Mr. Douglas D. Doop and Ms. Karen S. Bergman in surgery, construction of estradiol capsules, and collection of blood samples, and by Ms. Erica K. Paslick in radioimmunoassays.

Submitted on November 25, 1980
Accepted on March 9, 1981




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Tucker and R. Ringer
Controlled photoperiodic environments for food animals
Science, June 25, 1982; 216(4553): 1381 - 1386.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.