Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SENGER, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by HILLERS, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SENGER, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by HILLERS, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by SENGER, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by HILLERS, J. K.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 25, 433-437, Copyright © 1981 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

Influence of Blood Serum from Bulls and Heifers on Head-to-Head Agglutination and Acrosomal Maintenance in Bovine Spermatozoa

P. L. SENGER 1, J. F. McCUTCHAN 1, , and J. K. HILLERS 1

1 Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164


Three ejaculates from each of three bulls were used in a split ejaculate design to determine the influence of pre-freeze and post-thaw addition of either bull or heifer serum on the percentage of head-to-head agglutination (HHA) , intact acrosomes (PIA), and motility (MOT) of spermatozoa. Within the type of serum added, there was no difference in HHA between pre-freeze and post-thaw serum additions at 0 h. However, higher (P<0.01) HHA was present at 4 and 8 h when serum was added after thawing. Heifer serum resulted in greater (P<0.01) HHA than did bull serum at all hours of evaluation regardless of the time of serum addition. The HHA observed with heifer serum involved the acrosomal region predominantly while bull serum involved the acrosomal and postnuclear cap regions. Heifer serum also caused spermatozoa to agglutinate in much larger groups than bull serum. There was no consistent difference in PIA between bull and heifer serum. Neither the time of serum addition nor the type of serum influenced motility. When heifer serum was added to spermatozoa, the overall correlation coefficient between HHA and PIA was 0.82 (P<0.01). HHA was not related to PIA when bull serum was added. These data suggest that different mechanisms for HHA may be involved when bovine spermatozoa are exposed to bull or heifer serum.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to express their appreciation to Eastern Artificial Insemination Cooperative, Ithaca, NY, for providing bull serum samples. Also the technical assistance of Mr. W. C. Becker is acknowledged.

Submitted on January 29, 1981
Accepted on April 21, 1981







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.