|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 25, 744-751, Copyright © 1981 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
1 Department of Psychology,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 Previous studies have shown that sexual experience stimulates reproductive behavior and physiology in male rats. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of sexual rest on
the reproductive behavior and physiology of sexually experienced, male rats. Sexual experience
was provided by five single-ejaculation mating tests. On the fifth mating test, the males were
individually paired with a virgin, naturally estrous rat. Mating behavior and sperm transport were
measured. Males were then randomly assigned to one of two groups. The group designated Sexually
Active was mated 14 times during the subsequent 42 days. The other group of males was termed
Sexually Rested during that 42 day period. On Day 46, all males were individually paired with a
virgin, naturally estrous rat. Mating behavior and sperm transport were again measured. The
behavioral measures revealed that sexual rest depressed the inter-intromission interval and ejaculation latency in sexually experienced males. In addition, sperm transport within the female
reproductive tract was also reduced in females mated with Sexually Rested males. The weight of
selected reproductive tissues in Sexually Active and Sexually Rested groups, and in a group of
Sexually Inexperienced males was also determined. Sexual rest depressed the weight of the seminal
vesicles, but not of the d. bulbocavernosus. However, the weight of both the seminal vesicles and d.
bulbocavernosus of Sexually Rested rats was still greater than that of Sexually Inexperienced rats.
The results of this experiment demonstrate that sexual rest causes a decline in measures of both
reproductive behavior and physiology. The relevance of these findings to the lowered fecundity
of seasonal breeders, at the start of the breeding period, is discussed.
2 Department of Anatomy,
University of Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, Nebraska 68105
3 Department of Psychology,
University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the expert
technical assistance of Hugh Bradford in the data
collection, and the scholarly contributions of Jack
Cranford and Dick Saacke.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |