Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walters, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Short, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walters, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Short, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Walters, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Short, R. E.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 26, 640-646, Copyright © 1982 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Pituitary and ovarian function in postpartum beef cows. I. Effect of suckling on serum and follicular fluid hormones and follicular gonadotropin receptors

DL Walters, CC Kaltenbach, TG Dunn and RE Short

The effect of suckling on serum and follicular fluid hormones and on follicular gonadotropin receptors was studied. Sixteen anestrous postpartum cows were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: suckled (S) or weaned (W). All calves were allowed to suckle ad libitum from parturition to 21 days postpartum when calves from W cows were weaned. All cows were ovariectomized on Day 25 postpartum. W cows had more (P less than 0.01) pulses of LH during the 96-h period from weaning until ovariectomy than S cows (6.3 vs. 1.3 pulses). Serum concentrations of prolactin (Prl), estrone (E1), estradiol-17 beta (E2) and progesterone (P) were not different (P greater than 0.10) between groups. Furthermore, there were n differences (P greater than 0.10) in follicular in contents of luteinizing hormone (LH), E1, E2 and P between the treatment groups. However, follicular fluid content of Prl was greater (P less than 0.05) in the W cows than in the S cows (123 vs. 65.1 ng/cow). The number of follicular LH receptors was greater (P less than 0.05) in the W cows than in the S cows (71.1 vs. 48.3 fmoles/mg protein) although the number of follicular follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptors was not different (P greater than 0.10) between W cows and S cows (1531 vs. 1862 fmoles/mg protein). There were no correlation between serum hormone concentrations and follicular fluid hormone content; however, the numbers of follicular LH receptors and follicular fluid Prl content were highly correlated in the W cows (r = 0.85; P less than 0.05). It is concluded that removal of the suckling stimulus increases pulsatile LH release and the accumulation of Prl in the follicular fluid. These factors, either together or separately, may at least in part be responsible for the increase in follicular LH receptor concentrations that were observed in the W cows.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. P. Wettemann, C. A. Lents, N. H. Ciccioli, F. J. White, and I. Rubio
Nutritional- and suckling-mediated anovulation in beef cows
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E48 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.