Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juniewicz, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juniewicz, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Juniewicz, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. H.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 29, 464-471, Copyright © 1983 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Phenotypic variation in testosterone and luteinizing hormone production among boars: differential response to gonadotropin releasing hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone

PE Juniewicz and BH Johnson

Variation in ability of boars to produce testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) in response to both gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation, as well as quantitative relationships between pretreatment and posttreatment responses, were assessed in a population of 38 boars of similar age and breeding. Peripheral testosterone concentrations following either GnRH or ACTH increased (P less than 0.01) to peak circulating levels of 7.16 +/- 0.62 and 8.42 +/- 0.81 ng/ml by 120 and 45 min, respectively. Post- GnRH testosterone area varied from 7.44 to 50.84 ng/ml X h (CV = 47.44%) and post-ACTH testosterone area ranged from 3.05 to 28.78 ng/ml X h (CV = 46.09%). GnRH-induced increases in testosterone were preceded by elevations (P less than 0.01) in peripheral LH concentrations but ACTH had no effect upon LH levels. Post-GnRH area varied from 7.07 to 125.45 ng/ml X h (CV = 76.61%). Significant (P less than 0.01) correlations were obtained between pre-GnRH and post-GnRH testosterone areas (r = 0.58) and between pre-ACTH and post-ACTH testosterone areas (r = 0.67). Nonsignificant (P greater than 0.10) correlations were obtained between post-GnRH and post-ACTH testosterone areas (r = 0.006) and between post-GnRH testosterone and LH areas (r = 0.09). The testosterone producing ability of boars was highly variable and their innate ability to produce testosterone influenced their response to GnRH and ACTH. Additionally, the mechanisms by which GnRH and ACTH influence testosterone production in boars appear to differ. Variation in the ability of boars to produce testosterone could not be explained on the basis of differences in circulating levels of LH.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Bowen, S. Khan, L. Berghman, J. D. Kirby, R .P. Wettemann, and J. A. Vizcarra
Immunization of pigs against chicken gonadotropin-releasing hormone-II and lamprey gonadotropin-releasing hormone-III: Effects on gonadotropin secretion and testicular function
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 2990 - 2999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.