|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 30, 816-823, Copyright © 1984 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
ARTICLES |
MP Bendeck and DK Pomerantz
An intratesticular site of action has been proposed for the ability of estradiol (E2) to suppress testosterone secretion. Because testicular testosterone and E2 secretion as well as E2 receptors change during development, a physiologic role for E2 is possible. The present experiments compared the testes from 12-day-old and adult rats for the capacity of in vivo estradiol treatment to change in vitro androgen secretion in response to luteinizing hormone (LH) and dibutyryl cyclic AMP (Bt2cAMP). After 5 days in vivo treatment, in vitro responsiveness was estimated by radioimmunoassay (RIA) measurement of androgen secretion elicited by various doses of NIAMDD-LH-24 or 1.0 mM Bt2cAMP. Five days of E2 alone (500 ng/g BW s.c. once daily) markedly inhibited basal, LH-stimulated and Bt2cAMP-stimulated androgen production at both ages. Similar treatment of infant rats with LH (100 ng NIAMDD-LH-24/g BW) caused an increase in basal and LH-stimulated androgen secretion in vitro, but had no effect on the response to Bt2cAMP. The same pretreatment of adults with LH had no effect on basal, but inhibited LH- or Bt2cAMP-stimulated androgen secretion. Combined treatment of infants with E2 and LH for 5 days had no effect on basal or maximally stimulated androgen production; the in vitro response to submaximal stimulation with LH was significantly inhibited. Combined E2/LH treatment of adults significantly decreased the basal production of androgens and the response to LH or Bt2cAMP. These results suggest a major difference between the response to E2 of the Leydig cells from the rats of the two ages tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Govoroun, O. M. McMeel, H. Mecherouki, T. J. Smith, and Y. Guiguen 17{beta}-Estradiol Treatment Decreases Steroidogenic Enzyme Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels in the Rainbow Trout Testis Endocrinology, May 1, 2001; 142(5): 1841 - 1848. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |