Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, G. W.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 32, 120-128, Copyright © 1985 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Cauda epididymal sperm motility: a comparison among five species

TT Turner and GW Reich

Rat spermatozoa are immotile in the cauda epididymidis and are kept quiescent by a protein which increases viscoelasticity of cauda luminal fluid. How species-specific this phenomenon is, is unknown. In the present study, the motility of cauda epididymal spermatozoa of rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits and humans have been investigated. Sperm motility was observed in undiluted cauda sperm samples and in samples diluted with physiological diluents with or without Ca++, among others. Hamster sperm were studied in further detail to determine if the motility inhibiting factor in hamster cauda lumen fluid had characteristics similar to those previously described in the rat. Cauda fluid protein concentrations and apparent viscoelasticity were also determined and related to cauda sperm motility in all species. The results demonstrated that all species studied except rabbits have immotile sperm in their native cauda fluid and that additional Ca++ is not a factor in the initiation of motility. Cauda sperm immotility is not always related to fluid viscosity, however, so other as yet unknown mechanisms must be called upon in some species. The vigorous motility of rabbit spermatozoa in their native fluid implies that a fundamental difference exists in the relationship between epididymis and spermatozoa in rabbits from that observed in other species.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J AndrolHome page
J. L. Tomsig and T. T. Turner
Growth Factors and the Epididymis
J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 348 - 357.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.