Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferraro, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by McCormack, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferraro, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by McCormack, C. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ferraro, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by McCormack, C. E.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 33, 93-102, Copyright © 1985 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Gonadal regression despite light pulses coincident with locomotor activity in the Syrian hamster

JS Ferraro and CE McCormack

Feedback lighting (LDFB), which illuminates an animal cage in response to active wheel running, exposes only the photosensitive portion of the phase-response curve to light. In the hamster, the photoinducible zone of the circadian rhythm of photoperiodic photosensitivity occurs during the interval of active wheel running. Since LDFB exposes the photoinducible zone almost as much as constant light (LL), we predicted that LDFB would maintain gonadal function just as LL does. Surprisingly, 10 male hamsters exposed to 1-sec pulses of LDFB for 8 wk had regressed testes similar to those of hamsters in continuous darkness (DD) and significantly smaller than hamsters exposed to LL (P less than 0.01). Two of 5 male hamsters exposed to 2-min pulses of LDFB underwent complete testicular regression and two had partially regressed testes. All females exposed to LDFB or to DD ceased showing cyclic signs of ovulation within 20 days, whereas most hamsters exposed to LL continued to show signs of cyclic ovulation. Six of the 8 hamsters exposed to LL had ova in their oviducts at autopsy, and also had significantly larger uteri (P less than 0.01) than hamsters exposed to DD or LDFB. None of the latter two groups (n = 6 and 9, respectively) had oviductal ova at autopsy. These results demonstrate that considerable exposure of the photoinducible zone to light does not necessarily maintain gonadal function. Light delivered to the photoinducible zone by LDFB may disrupt the normal alignment (internal coincidence) of circadian rhythms, thereby causing gonadal regression. Gonadal induction can occur when the photoinducible zone is exposed to light; however, it may not be the light itself, but rather the action of the light to alter the phase relationships of several oscillators, that causes induction and maintenance of the gonads.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
J. J. Chiesa, M. Angles-Pujolras, A. Diez-Noguera, and T. Cambras
History-Dependent Changes in Entrainment of the Activity Rhythm in the Syrian Hamster (Mesocricetus auratus)
J Biol Rhythms, February 1, 2006; 21(1): 45 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
C. E. McCormack
Illuminance Threshold for Maintenance of Testes in Syrian Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) Is Higher in Continuous Light than in Long Photoperiods
J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 1990; 5(2): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.