|
|
||||||||
Biology of Reproduction, Vol 33, 418-422, Copyright © 1985 by Society for the Study of Reproduction
ARTICLES |
RJ Nelson
Two populations of male prairie voles, one derived from an outbred laboratory colony and the second consisting of F1 offspring of wild- trapped voles, were tested for responsiveness to photoperiod. Animals were reared from birth until 35 days of age either in 16L:8D or 8L:16D photoperiods. Short day lengths did not affect the reproductive apparatus of the laboratory-strain voles; however, offspring of wild- caught voles manifested arrested development of the reproductive system in short photoperiods. These results suggest that selection processes associated with laboratory husbandry can alter responsiveness to photoperiod; the use of wild-trapped animals or their F1 progeny is indicated in photoperiodism research.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. F. Ruby, M. T. Barakat, and H. C. Heller Phenotypic Differences in Reentrainment Behavior and Sensitivity to Nighttime Light Pulses in Siberian Hamsters J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2004; 19(6): 530 - 541. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Kliman and G. R. Lynch Evidence for Genetic Variation in the Occurrence of the Photoresponse of the Djungarian Hamster, Phodopus sungorus J Biol Rhythms, July 1, 1992; 7(2): 161 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |