Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schanbacher, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tindall, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schanbacher, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tindall, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schanbacher, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tindall, D. J.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 36, 340-350, Copyright © 1987 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Androgenic regulation of luteinizing hormone secretion: relationship to androgen binding in sheep pituitary

BD Schanbacher, MP Johnson and DJ Tindall

Castrated ram lambs (wethers) were investigated for sensitivity to androgen feedback and to determine whether this feedback inhibition of luteinizing hormone (LH) was associated with changes in pituitary androgen receptors. Administration of Silastic capsules containing either dihydrotestosterone or testosterone was found to produce dose- dependent inhibitory effects on serum LH levels in wethers. Physiological dosages of these androgens (i.e., those that produce serum levels of dihydrotestosterone [0.24 ng/ml] or testosterone [2.1 ng/ml] similar to those of intact rams) resulted in differential inhibition of serum LH and LH content of the anterior pituitary. Whereas the inhibitory effect of dihydrotestosterone on pituitary LH content was much more dramatic than that seen with testosterone, the high dosage of testosterone also produced a substantial decrease in pituitary LH content. Responses of the pituitary to changes in serum androgen were compared to responses of the seminal vesicle, which served as a control androgen target organ. Androgen levels were positively correlated with seminal vesicle weights, but pituitary weights were unaffected by castration and/or androgen replacement. Treatments with dihydrotestosterone were associated with decreased cytosol androgen binding activity (i.e., receptors) in pituitary and seminal vesicle, suggesting that both of these tissues were sites of androgen action. Although testosterone inhibited serum LH levels, pituitary cytosol androgen receptors were not affected by changes in serum testosterone. We conclude from these data that dihydrotestosterone is a physiological regulator of pituitary LH secretion in the ram and that further study is needed to investigate the complex actions of testosterone and its metabolites on pituitary function.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.