Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Turner, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, M.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 45, 358-364, Copyright © 1991 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Different mechanisms are responsible for 3H-androgen movement across the rat seminiferous and epididymal epithelia in vivo

TT Turner and M Yamamoto
Department of Urology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of the microenvironment of the seminiferous and epididymal tubules were examined in a series of experiments utilizing in vivo microperifusion, microperfusion, and micropuncture. Intraluminal 3H-androgen concentrations in seminiferous tubules increased linearly as interstitial 3H-androgen concentrations increased from 10 nM to 2,000 nM, but in caput epididymidal tubules, intraluminal 3H-androgen concentrations increased hyperbolically across the same range of peritubular 3H-androgen concentrations. Intraluminal 3H-androgen concentrations in the caput epididymidis did not rise above approximately 340 nM even if peritibular 3H-androgen concentrations exceeded 2,000 nM. Perifusion of caput tubules with 0.1 mM dinitrophenol or potassium cyanide or 100 micrograms/ml cyclohexamide significantly reduced proluminal 3H-androgen movement, but tubules perifused with control medium would not support antigrade 3H-androgen movement in the absence of native lumen fluids which contain androgen- binding protein. Antigrade proluminal 3H-androgen movement was not inhibited by competition with estradiol at ten-times 3H-androgen concentrations. Thus, energy-requiring protein synthesis is necessary for antigrade 3H-androgen movement in the caput epididymidis, but the mechanism for the interaction of intracellular protein(s) and 3H- androgen movement remains undetermined.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.