Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sionov, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gallily, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sionov, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gallily, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sionov, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gallily, R.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 49, 588-595, Copyright © 1993 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Trophoblasts protect the inner cell mass from macrophage destruction

RV Sionov, S Yagel, R Har-Nir and R Gallily
Lautenberg Center for General and Tumor Immunology, Hadassah Medical School Hebrew University, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Several mechanisms have been suggested to account for the survival of the semiallogeneic fetus in the maternal uterus. However, no data are available to explain how the blastocyst resists the high number of macrophages in the uterus at the time of implantation. The present study examines the in vitro development of murine 3.5-day-old syngeneic or semiallogeneic blastocysts in the presence of nonactivated or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated macrophages. It was found that the in vitro development of blastocysts was undisturbed by the presence of nonactivated or LPS-activated macrophages. The outgrowing trophoblasts were not only nonadhesive to the macrophages but also repelled them actively, thus preventing them from reaching the inner cell mass (ICM). Removing the zona pellucida by use of pronase or killing the ICM by irradiation did not alter the repulsion of macrophages by the trophoblasts. On the other hand, removal of the trophectoderm by antibody and complement treatment rendered the macrophages adhesive and destructive to the ICM. Four of 15 ICM (27%) were destroyed by nonactivated macrophages, and all of the ICM (15/15) were destroyed by LPS-activated macrophages. It is noteworthy that the addition of colchicine, cytochalasin B, proteinase inhibitors, anti-transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta) antibodies, and indomethacin had no effect on the repulsion of macrophages by the trophoblasts. Therefore, it seems that microtubular proteins, microfilaments, extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes, TGF beta, and prostaglandins are not involved in the repulsion process. These results indicate that trophoblasts protect the ICM from the destructive action of macrophages by a repulsion mechanism of an as yet unknown nature.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
H. R. Petty, A. L. Kindzelskii, J. Espinoza, and R. Romero
Trophoblast contact deactivates human neutrophils.
J. Immunol., March 1, 2006; 176(5): 3205 - 3214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.