Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herbosa, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herbosa, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herbosa, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, D. L.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 50, 1367-1376, Copyright © 1994 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Prenatal photoperiod and the timing of puberty in the female lamb

CG Herbosa, RI Wood, H I'Anson and DL Foster
Reproductive Sciences Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109- 0404.

In female sheep, photoperiod regulates the timing of the transition to adulthood. We tested the hypothesis that photoperiod very early in development influences the timing of the pubertal LH rise that initiates sexual maturation. The first experiment was designed to determine the influence of day length information perceived before birth by varying prenatal photoperiod experience. Two groups that experienced either increasing or constant long days prenatally, and then a gradually decreasing photoperiod postnatally, reached puberty at the same age (Prenatal Increase, 20.4 +/- 0.5 wk vs. Prenatal Long Days [LD], 19.4 +/- 0.8 wk). Puberty in these groups was much earlier than in two control groups exposed to the same photoperiods, but beginning at birth, for 13 wk (Postnatal Increase, 29.6 +/- 1.0 wk; Postnatal LD, 26.2 +/- 1.3 wk). In the second experiment, the role of prenatal photoperiod in timing sexual maturity was also examined through the use of treatments with greater contrast. Lambs were exposed prenatally to either decreasing or increasing day lengths. Beginning at birth, both groups were exposed to a decreasing photoperiod. Although only half of the lambs in each group exhibited the pubertal LH rise, those that attained puberty did so at the same age (Prenatal Decrease, 14.8 +/- 1.0 wk vs. Prenatal Increase, 14.8 +/- 0.3 wk). We therefore conclude that day length cues experienced postnatally predominantly time sexual maturation in the female lamb.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
M. Savabieasfahani, K. Kannan, O. Astapova, N. P. Evans, and V. Padmanabhan
Developmental Programming: Differential Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol-A or Methoxychlor on Reproductive Function
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5956 - 5966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.