Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wildt, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roth, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wildt, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roth, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wildt, D. E.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 51, 441-451, Copyright © 1994 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Developmental competence of domestic cat embryos fertilized in vivo versus in vitro

TL Roth, WF Swanson and DE Wildt
National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia 20008.

Development of in vitro-fertilized (IVF) cat embryos was compared to that of naturally produced cat embryos in vivo and in vitro. To obtain in vivo-fertilized embryos, queens were mated three times daily on the second and third days of natural estrus and ovariohysterectomized at 64, 76, 100, 124, or 148 h after the first copulation. Embryos were flushed from the reproductive tract, evaluated for developmental stage, and cultured. For IVF, oocytes from gonadotropin-stimulated queens were inseminated with electroejaculated cat sperm in Ham's F-10 and evaluated for fertilization (cleavage to > or = 2 cells) at 30 h. In vitro development of embryos fertilized in vivo (n = 109) and in vitro (n = 46) was evaluated every 24 h for up to 10 days. High-quality embryos recovered at 64, 76, 100, 124, and 148 h after the first copulation were typically 1 to 2 cells (13 of 20), 5 to 8 cells (18 of 28), 9 to 16 cells (14 of 24), morulae (15 of 21), and compact morulae (11 of 18), respectively, suggesting blastomere cleavage once per day in vivo after the first three rapid cell divisions. A similar developmental rate to the morula stage (p > or = 0.05) was achieved in vitro by embryos derived from both in vitro and in vivo fertilization. Additionally, the proportion (p > or = 0.05) of in vivo-generated embryos (2 to 16 cells) that developed to morulae (64 of 83; 77.1%) was similar to that of IVF embryos (28 of 46; 60.9%). However, none of the IVF embryos (0/46), but 70.6% (77 of 109) of the in vivo-produced embryos, achieved blastocyst formation in culture (p < or = 0.05). Furthermore, 66.2% (51 of 77) of these blastocysts exhibited zona hatching. Incidence of morula and blastocyst formation in the in vivo group was influenced by stage of the embryo at collection. Embryos that were at the 9- to 16-cell stage at recovery were more likely (p < or = 0.05) to achieve morula or blastocyst status and emerge from the zona pellucida than younger-stage counterparts. In summary, the in vivo and in vitro growth rate of cat embryos produced after natural mating was comparable to that of embryos fertilized and cultured in vitro. However, developmental ability to the blastocyst stage was superior for embryos produced in vivo after natural mating.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.