Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagler, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagler, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nagler, J. J.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 54, 8-15, Copyright © 1996 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Mechanisms controlling egg size and number in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

CR Tyler, TG Pottinger, E Santos, JP Sumpter, SA Price, S Brooks and JJ Nagler
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom.

Female rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) produce a single batch of eggs each year; synchronous growth of oocytes, all of which are ovulated at the same time, occurs in the two ovaries. To examine the regulatory mechanisms controlling egg size and number, virgin female rainbow trout were subjected to unilateral ovariectomy (ULO) during early vitellogenesis, and oocyte recruitment and growth in the remaining ovary were monitored. The study also set out to determine whether the presence of a second population of smaller oocytes in the maturing pool (induced by ULO) affected the timing of ovulation and/or the size of the eggs ovulated. Two months after ULO, there was no difference in the gonadosomatic index between ULO fish and controls. Compensatory ovarian hypertrophy resulted from the recruitment of a second population of primary oocytes into the vitellogenic pool. This population of smaller maturing oocytes in the ULO fish displayed growth rates up to twice those of the population of larger oocytes in the same ovary and of oocytes in controls. The growth rate of the population of larger oocytes in the ULO fish was not altered by the recruitment of a second maturing population. One month after ULO, fish had a lower concentration of plasma estradiol-17 beta than did controls; subsequently the concentrations of plasma estradiol-17 beta in the ULO and control groups were similar. After ULO, plasma levels of vitellogenin in the ULO fish did not differ from those in the control group throughout the study. At or close to ovulation, the fecundity of ULO fish was 75-80% that of controls. In the control group, oocytes appeared to reach a certain critical size before they were ovulated, and fish with higher fecundity ovulated later than their less fecund counterparts. ULO did not affect the timing of ovulation, and ULO fish ovulated eggs with a considerably greater size-range than did controls.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.-P. de Bruin, R. G. Gosden, C. E. Finch, and B. M. Leaman
Ovarian Aging in Two Species of Long-Lived Rockfish, Sebastes aleutianus and S. alutus
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 1036 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. W. Wood and G. J. Van Der Kraak
Apoptosis and Ovarian Function: Novel Perspectives from the Teleosts
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 264 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.