Biol Reprod 2009 SSR Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caamano, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Youngs, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caamano, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Youngs, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Caamano, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Youngs, C. R.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 55, 1179-1184, Copyright © 1996 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

beta-mercaptoethanol enhances blastocyst formation rate of bovine in vitro-matured/in vitro-fertilized embryos

JN Caamano, ZY Ryoo, JA Thomas and CR Youngs
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-3150, USA.

The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of beta- mercaptoethanol (beta-ME) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) on in vitro development of bovine embryos derived from oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro and to examine the mechanism through which beta-ME may influence embryo development. A 2 x 2 factorial treatment arrangement was used to evaluate the effect of 0 or 100 microM beta-ME and 0% or 10% FBS on embryos cultured in Medium 199 (M199) in the absence of somatic cells. Embryos were randomly allocated within stage of development (< 8 cells or 8-16 cells) to one of four treatment combinations and were cultured for 6 days. Both beta-ME and FBS promoted increased (p < 0.01) development of embryos to the blastocyst stage, and their effects were greater (p < 0.01) in 8- to 16-cell embryos than in embryos having fewer than 8 cells at the initiation of treatment. The cysteine and cystine content of M199, with and without beta-ME, were determined by HPLC. Medium supplemented with beta-ME contained neither cysteine nor cystine, and it is suggested that these compounds were converted into a mixed disulfide between cysteine and beta-ME. These results indicate that beta-ME is capable of enhancing bovine embryo development in a cell-free, serum-free culture system.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Funahashi
Effect of beta-mercaptoethanol during in vitro fertilization procedures on sperm penetration into porcine oocytes and the early development in vitro
Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 889 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Takahashi, T. Nagai, N. Okamura, H. Takahashi, and A. Okano
Promoting Effect of {beta}-Mercaptoethanol on In Vitro Development under Oxidative Stress and Cystine Uptake of Bovine Embryos
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 562 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Stojkovic, K. Westesen, V. Zakhartchenko, P. Stojkovic, K. Boxhammer, and E. Wolf
Coenzyme Q10 in Submicron-Sized Dispersion Improves Development, Hatching, Cell Proliferation, and Adenosine Triphosphate Content of In Vitro-Produced Bovine Embryos
Biol Reprod, August 1, 1999; 61(2): 541 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.M. Lim, B.C. Reggio, R.A. Godke, and W. Hansel
Development of in-vitro-derived bovine embryos cultured in 5% CO2 in air or in 5% O2, 5% CO2 and 90% N2
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 1999; 14(2): 458 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ushijima, H. Yamakawa, and H. Nagashima
Cryopreservation of Bovine Pre-Morula-Stage In Vitro Matured/In Vitro Fertilized Embryos after Delipidation and before Use in Nucleus Transfer
Biol Reprod, February 1, 1999; 60(2): 534 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.