Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maleszewski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maleszewski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maleszewski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 58, 8-14, Copyright © 1998 by Society for the Study of Reproduction

ARTICLES

Behavior of transgenic mouse spermatozoa with galline protamine

M Maleszewski, S Kuretake, D Evenson, H Yanagimachi, J Bjordahl and R Yanagimachi
Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96822, USA.

General morphology, physical and chemical stability of nuclei, and postfertilization behavior of spermatozoa from transgenic mice [TgN (Prml Gal) 223 Bri] containing nuclear avian protamine (galline) were compared to those in the spermatozoa of wild-type (Wild) mice. Galline to protamine I ratios in spermatozoal nuclei of transgenic mice, strains 3175 (T75) and 3177 (T77), were 1.94 and 5.62, respectively. Live T75 and T77 spermatozoa were indistinguishable in their gross morphology from Wild spermatozoa. However, unlike Wild and T75 spermatozoa, T77 spermatozoa were vulnerable to mechanical handling, as about 40% of heads and tails were separated after gentle pipetting in suspension. Motility of T77 spermatozoa was markedly inferior to that of T75 and Wild. Chromatin heterogeneity and instability of transgenic spermatozoal nuclei were evident by transmission electron microscopy, staining reaction to Giemsa, and, as apparent by both light microscopy and flow cytometry, reaction to SDS detergent. Wild and T75 spermatozoa fertilized 90% and 60% of zona-intact oocytes in vitro, respectively. T77 spermatozoa completely failed to fertilize and bound to zona surfaces very weakly, and none of them inserted their heads into the zona. Although inefficiently, T77 spermatozoa could fertilize zona-free oocytes in vitro, indicating some ability to undergo capacitation and spontaneous acrosome reaction in vitro. After microsurgical injection into oocytes, the rate of nuclear decondensation was the greatest in rooster spermatozoa, followed by T77, T75, and Wild spermatozoa.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. Oliva
Protamines and male infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 417 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.