Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kraeling, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rampacek, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kraeling, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rampacek, G. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kraeling, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rampacek, G. B.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 58, 1199-1205, Copyright © 1998 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Evidence for a luteinizing hormone surge center in the hypothalamus of the pig [In Process Citation]

RR Kraeling, B Johnson, CR Barb and GB Rampacek
United States Department of Agriculture, R.B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA.

Studies were conducted to determine whether there is an LH surge generator in the hypothalamus of the pig. In experiment 1, 157-day-old ovariectomized (OVX) gilts received 1.5 microg estradiol benzoate (EB)/kg BW i.m. every 12 h from 0 through 24, 48, 72, or 96 h. Blood was sampled every 6 h from 3 to 36 h and every 3 h from 36 through 144 h. One of 3, 4 of 4, 4 of 4, and 2 of 3 gilts displayed an LH surge after treatment for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, respectively. With the exception that time to maximum LH concentration was greater in gilts treated for 96 h than in those treated for 72 h (p < 0.05), parameters of the surge were similar among all gilts. In experiment 2a, an Alzet osmotic pump containing EB or vehicle was inserted s.c. behind an ear of 124-day-old OVX gilts, resulting in the following daily doses of EB: 0, 0.75, 1.50, or 3.00 microg/kg BW. Blood was sampled at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h and every 8 h thereafter through 168 h to evaluate surge secretion of LH, and every 15 min for 8 h starting at 168 h to evaluate pulsatile LH secretion. Zero of 3, 0 of 2, 3 of 3, and 3 of 3 gilts displayed an LH surge after 0, 0.75, 1.50, and 3.00 microg EB/kg BW, respectively. Parameters of the surge were similar among gilts. Pulsatile LH secretion, evaluated 7 days after pump insertion, was significantly suppressed for estradiol-treated gilts compared to controls. In experiment 2b, at 182 days of age, 10 gilts used in experiment 2a plus 2 additional gilts in the original group prepared but not used for experiment 2a, were randomly assigned in groups (n=3) to the following daily doses of EB: 0, 0.19, 0.38, or 0.75 microg/kg BW, administered again by osmotic pump. Treatment and blood-sampling schedules were the same as in experiment 2a. Zero, 0, 1, and 2 gilts displayed an LH surge after treatment with 0, 0.19, 0.38, and 0.75 microg EB/kg BW, respectively. Parameters of the surge were similar among gilts that displayed an LH surge. Pulsatile LH secretion was significantly suppressed for estradiol-treated gilts compared to controls. Thus, the LH surge resulted from positive feedback stimulation of a specific surge generator rather than attenuation or dissipation of negative feedback inhibition of estradiol on a pulse generator.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.