Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rae, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bramley, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rae, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bramley, T. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rae, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bramley, T. A.

Biology of Reproduction, Vol 58, 1394-1406, Copyright © 1998 by Society for the Study of Reproduction


ARTICLES

Specific non-genomic, membrane-localized binding sites for progesterone in the bovine corpus luteum [In Process Citation]

MT Rae, GS Menzies, AS McNeilly, K Woad, R Webb and TA Bramley
Department of Biosciences, University of Kent at Canterbury, United Kingdom.

Fractionation of bovine corpus luteum (CL) homogenates on continuous sucrose density gradients with and without preincubation with 3H- progesterone demonstrated high levels of tracer binding and high content of endogenous progesterone associated with particulate membrane fractions. Analysis of gradient fractions for a range of luteal plasma membrane and intracellular organelle marker enzyme activities indicated that endogenous progesterone content and 3H-progesterone-binding activity were associated with fractions enriched in luteal plasma membrane markers. This was confirmed by pretreatment of homogenates with the saponin, digitonin, prior to fractionation. Digitonin perturbed the buoyant density of luteal surface membrane markers and 3H- progesterone binding to a similar extent, but did not perturb the buoyant densities of other intracellular markers to the same degree. Interestingly, digitonin pretreatment also increased the proportion of progesterone tracer that entered the gradients. We consistently failed to demonstrate significant binding of 3H-progesterone to membrane fractions incubated with progesterone tracer in vitro. However, when digitonin was included in the in vitro binding assay, we observed a dramatic, dose-dependent stimulation of 3H-progesterone binding by digitonin. Other radiolabeled steroids tested (3H-cortisol, 3H- testosterone) bound poorly in the presence or absence of digitonin. 3H- Progesterone binding in the presence of optimal digitonin concentrations increased linearly with increasing luteal membrane concentration; was dependent on the pH, duration, and temperature of incubation; and low levels of progesterone (68 nM) competed for tracer binding. A range of other steroids tested (androgens, estrogens, corticosteroids, steroid precursors) competed at higher concentrations (10- to 100-fold) or did not compete at all for 3H-progesterone binding. There was no correlation between the hydrophobicity of various steroids and their ability to compete for binding. Moreover, a number of agonists and antagonists specific for the genomic progesterone receptor, agonists of peripheral benzodiazepine receptors, and inhibitors of a range of steroidogenic enzymes did not compete for 3H- progesterone binding. Western blots confirmed that detergent- solubilized progesterone-binding sites could be resolved from cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage and 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Moreover, extraction of bound steroid from the binding site and HPLC demonstrated identity to progesterone, suggesting that no metabolism of the progesterone tracer had occurred during incubation. Progesterone binding to membranes of large luteal cells was higher compared with binding to small luteal cells, and levels were similar in membranes prepared from CL at all stages of the luteal phase. We suggest that bovine luteal progesterone-binding sites may play a role either in sequestration of newly synthesized progesterone or in the mediation of autocrine and/or paracrine actions of progesterone in the CL.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
F. Stormshak and C. V. Bishop
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Estrogen and progesterone signaling: Genomic and nongenomic actions in domestic ruminants
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 299 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. L. Ashley, C. M. Clay, T. A. Farmerie, G. D. Niswender, and T. M. Nett
Cloning and Characterization of an Ovine Intracellular Seven Transmembrane Receptor for Progesterone that Mediates Calcium Mobilization
Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4151 - 4159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. J. Peluso, A. Pappalardo, R. Losel, and M. Wehling
Progesterone Membrane Receptor Component 1 Expression in the Immature Rat Ovary and Its Role in Mediating Progesterone's Antiapoptotic Action
Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): 3133 - 3140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Z. Cai and C. Stocco
Expression and Regulation of Progestin Membrane Receptors in the Rat Corpus Luteum
Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5522 - 5532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Goldman, A. Weiss, I. Almalah, and E. Shalev
Progesterone receptor expression in human decidua and fetal membranes before and after contractions: possible mechanism for functional progesterone withdrawal
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 11(4): 269 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Okuda, A. Korzekwa, M. Shibaya, S. Murakami, R. Nishimura, M. Tsubouchi, I. Woclawek-Potocka, and D. J. Skarzynski
Progesterone Is a Suppressor of Apoptosis in Bovine Luteal Cells
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 2065 - 2071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. M. Borman, C. L. Chaffin, K. M. Schwinof, R. L. Stouffer, and M. B. Zelinski-Wooten
Progesterone Promotes Oocyte Maturation, but Not Ovulation, in Nonhuman Primate Follicles Without a Gonadotropin Surge
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 366 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. J. Diaz and M. C. Wiltbank
Acquisition of Luteolytic Capacity: Changes in Prostaglandin F2{alpha} Regulation of Steroid Hormone Receptors and Estradiol Biosynthesis in Pig Corpora Lutea
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1333 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. M. LOSEL, E. FALKENSTEIN, M. FEURING, A. SCHULTZ, H.-C. TILLMANN, K. ROSSOL-HASEROTH, and M. WEHLING
Nongenomic Steroid Action: Controversies, Questions, and Answers
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 965 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Zhu, J. Bond, and P. Thomas
Identification, classification, and partial characterization of genes in humans and other vertebrates homologous to a fish membrane progestin receptor
PNAS, March 4, 2003; 100(5): 2237 - 2242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Schwarzenbach, P. R. Manna, D. M. Stocco, G. Chakrabarti, and A. K. Mukhopadhyay
Stimulatory Effect of Progesterone on the Expression of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein in MA-10 Leydig Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 1054 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.J. Peluso, G. Fernandez, A. Pappalardo, and B.A. White
Characterization of a Putative Membrane Receptor for Progesterone in Rat Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 94 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Thomas, J. Pinter, and S. Das
Upregulation of the Maturation-Inducing Steroid Membrane Receptor in Spotted Seatrout Ovaries by Gonadotropin During Oocyte Maturation and Its Physiological Significance
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 21 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
E. Falkenstein, H.-C. Tillmann, M. Christ, M. Feuring, and M. Wehling
Multiple Actions of Steroid Hormones---A Focus on Rapid, Nongenomic Effects
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 513 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. El-Hefnawy, P. R. Manna, M. Luconi, E. Baldi, J. P. Slotte, and I. Huhtaniemi
Progesterone Action in a Murine Leydig Tumor Cell Line (mLTC-1), Possibly through a Nonclassical Receptor Type
Endocrinology, January 1, 2000; 141(1): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. J. Skarzynski and K. Okuda
Sensitivity of Bovine Corpora Lutea to Prostaglandin F2{alpha} Is Dependent on Progesterone, Oxytocin, and Prostaglandins
Biol Reprod, June 1, 1999; 60(6): 1292 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.