Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Biology of Reproduction 60, 72-77 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Relationship between Follicular Development and the Decline in the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Surge in Heifers

John R. Gibbonsa, Milo C. Wiltbankb, and O.J. Ginther1,a

a Departments of Animal Health and Biomedical Science and b Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Experiment 1 was conducted to determine whether progesterone affects the pattern of the FSH surge or follicular development associated with a follicular wave in heifers. On Day 7 (Day 0 = ovulation), heifers were allocated into a group receiving prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}; n = 6) or a control group (n = 5). Twenty-four hours later, all detectable follicles (>= 2 mm) were ablated (Hour 0). Follicular development was monitored Hours 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16, at 8-h intervals thereafter until Hour 112. To monitor FSH concentrations, blood was sampled at Hours -24, 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16, and at 8-h intervals thereafter until Hour 104. There were no differences (p > 0.05) between the PGF2{alpha}-treated group and controls in the patterns of the FSH surge or follicular development.

Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that 3-mm follicles do not have FSH-suppressing capacity and that suppression increases as follicles grow beyond 5 mm. Twenty-four hours after an injection of PGF2{alpha} (Days 6–8), heifers were subjected to either ablation of follicles >= 2 mm or ovariectomy. Intact heifers were allocated into four groups (n = 5) in which all follicles of the new wave were ablated upon reaching either 3, 5, or 7 mm or were not ablated (controls). Blood was sampled at 8-h intervals to monitor FSH and estradiol-17ß. Averaged over Hours 8–120, FSH concentrations (ng/ml) were higher (p < 0.05) in the ovariectomized (2.02 ± 0.05) and the 3-mm groups (1.91 ± 0.05) than in the 5-mm (1.52 ± 0.05), 7-mm (1.35 ± 0.04), and control groups (1.33 ± 0.05); and estradiol concentrations (pg/ml) were lower (p < 0.05) in the ovariectomized group (0.19 ± 0.03) than in the 3-mm (1.48 ± 0.16), 5-mm (1.56 ± 0.15), 7-mm (2.22 ± 0.27), and control groups (2.55 ± 0.49).

In conclusion, the presence of endogenous progesterone did not affect FSH patterns or follicular development. Follicles <= 3 mm had no detectable capacity to suppress FSH. As follicles grew from 3 to 5 mm, they gained the capacity to suppress FSH; however, as follicles grew beyond 5 mm, FSH-suppressing capacity did not increase. The FSH decline was not attributable to an increase in circulating estradiol.

1 Correspondence: O.J. Ginther, Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Science, 1655 Linden Dr., University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706. FAX: 608 262 7420; ojg{at}ahabs.wisc.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Lopez, R. Sartori, and M. C. Wiltbank
Reproductive Hormones and Follicular Growth During Development of One or Multiple Dominant Follicles in Cattle
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 788 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. Sisco, L. J. Hagemann, A. N. Shelling, and P. L. Pfeffer
Isolation of Genes Differentially Expressed in Dominant and Subordinate Bovine Follicles
Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 3904 - 3913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, M.A. Beg, D.R. Bergfelt, F.X. Donadeu, and K. Kot
Follicle Selection in Monovular Species
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 638 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. C.L. Bleach, R. G. Glencross, S. A. Feist, N. P. Groome, and P. G. Knight
Plasma Inhibin A in Heifers: Relationship with Follicle Dynamics, Gonadotropins, and Steroids During the Estrous Cycle and after Treatment with Bovine Follicular Fluid
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2001; 64(3): 743 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, D.R. Bergfelt, L.J. Kulick, and K. Kot
Selection of the Dominant Follicle in Cattle: Role of Estradiol
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2000; 63(2): 383 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, D.R. Bergfelt, L.J. Kulick, and K. Kot
Selection of the Dominant Follicle in Cattle: Role of Two-Way Functional Coupling Between Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and the Follicles
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2000; 62(4): 920 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E.L. Gastal, M.O. Gastal, and O.J. Ginther
Experimental Assumption of Dominance by a Smaller Follicle and Associated Hormonal Changes in Mares
Biol Reprod, September 1, 1999; 61(3): 724 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.