|
|
||||||||
Articles |
a Department of Clinical Studies, Reproduction,
b Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
c Embryo Technology Center, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Tjele, Denmark
d Department of Biochemistry, Oklahoma State University College of Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74107
e Department of Morphology, Genetics and Aquatic Biology, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo, Norway
f Roslin Institut, Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland, United Kingdom
Fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome 6- and chromosome 7-specific probes was used to assess the extent of chromosome abnormalities in developing bovine blastocysts at 78 days after insemination in vivo or in vitro. Interphase nuclei (N = 10 946) were analyzed from 151 blastocysts produced in vitro and from 28 blastocysts recovered from superovulated animals. This revealed that 72% (109 of 151) of the in vitro-produced blastocysts were mixoploid, i.e., were a mixture of normal, diploid, and polyploid cells. However, only a small fraction of the total number of cells were chromosomally abnormal. Of the mixoploid blastocysts, 83% (91 of 109) contained less than 10% polyploid cells, 13% (14 of 109) contained 1125% polyploid cells, and only 4% (4 of 109) of the blastocysts had more than 25% polyploid cells per blastocyst. In contrast, a significantly lower proportion (25%) of mixoploidy was found in 28 bovine blastocysts developed in vivo (p < 0.0001). All of the mixoploid blastocysts that had developed in vivo contained less than 10% polyploid cells. No entirely aneuploid blastocysts, i.e., blastocysts in which all cells had the same type of chromosome abnormality, were found in either of the groups. Taken together, the most common chromosome abnormalities observed were diploid-triploid mixoploidies and diploid-tetraploid mixoploidies. Thus, our results confirm earlier reports that morphologically normal bovine blastocysts developed in vivo are often mixoploids. We further show that in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts have a high rate of mixoploidy. Although the difference in mixoploidy rate detected in this study may not be general, it is an interesting phenomenon for further studies.
2 Correspondence: Dorthe Viuff, Department of Clinical Studies, Reproduction, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Dyrlægevej 68, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. FAX: 45 35 28 29 72; dv{at}kvl.dk
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. I Alexopoulos, P. Maddox-Hyttel, P. Tveden-Nyborg, N. T D'Cruz, T. R Tecirlioglu, M. A Cooney, K. Schauser, M. K Holland, and A. J French Developmental disparity between in vitro-produced and somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine days 14 and 21 embryos: implications for embryonic loss Reproduction, October 1, 2008; 136(4): 433 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.H. Betts and P. Madan Permanent embryo arrest: molecular and cellular concepts Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 14(8): 445 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Malekinejad, E. J Schoevers, I. J.J.M Daemen, C. Zijlstra, B. Colenbrander, J. Fink-Gremmels, and B. A.J Roelen Exposure of Oocytes to the Fusarium Toxins Zearalenone and Deoxynivalenol Causes Aneuploidy and Abnormal Embryo Development in Pigs Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 840 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.L Green, D.N Wells, and B Oback Cattle Cloned from Increasingly Differentiated Muscle Cells Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 395 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Corcoran, T Fair, S Park, D Rizos, O V Patel, G W Smith, P M Coussens, J J Ireland, M P Boland, A C O Evans, et al. Suppressed expression of genes involved in transcription and translation in in vitro compared with in vivo cultured bovine embryos. Reproduction, April 1, 2006; 131(4): 651 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lonergan, H. G. Pedersen, D. Rizos, T. Greve, P. D. Thomsen, T. Fair, A. Evans, and M. P. Boland Effect of the Post-Fertilization Culture Environment on the Incidence of Chromosome Aberrations in Bovine Blastocysts Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1096 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Shi, F. Dirim, E. Wolf, V. Zakhartchenko, and T. Haaf Methylation Reprogramming and Chromosomal Aneuploidy in In Vivo Fertilized and Cloned Rabbit Preimplantation Embryos Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 340 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Farin, P. W. Farin, and J. A. Piedrahita Development of fetuses from in vitro-produced and cloned bovine embryos J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E53 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Knijn, J. O. Gjorret, P. L.A.M. Vos, P. J.M. Hendriksen, B. C. van der Weijden, P. Maddox-Hyttel, and S. J. Dieleman Consequences of In Vivo Development and Subsequent Culture on Apoptosis, Cell Number, and Blastocyst Formation in Bovine Embryos Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1371 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.C. McCauley, W.C. Buhi, G.M. Wu, J. Mao, J.N Caamano, B.A. Didion, and B.N. Day Oviduct-Specific Glycoprotein Modulates Sperm-Zona Binding and Improves Efficiency of Porcine Fertilization In Vitro Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 828 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Booth, D. Viuff, S. Tan, P. Holm, T. Greve, and H. Callesen Numerical Chromosome Errors in Day 7 Somatic Nuclear Transfer Bovine Blastocysts Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 922 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rizos, A. Gutierrez-Adan, S. Perez-Garnelo, J. de la Fuente, M.P. Boland, and P. Lonergan Bovine Embryo Culture in the Presence or Absence of Serum: Implications for Blastocyst Development, Cryotolerance, and Messenger RNA Expression Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 236 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Bean, T. J. Hassold, L. Judis, and P. A. Hunt Fertilization in vitro increases non-disjunction during early cleavage divisions in a mouse model system Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2362 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Arat, J. Gibbons, S. J. Rzucidlo, D. S. Respess, M. Tumlin, and S. L. Stice In Vitro Development of Bovine Nuclear Transfer Embryos from Transgenic Clonal Lines of Adult and Fetal Fibroblast Cells of the Same Genotype Biol Reprod, June 1, 2002; 66(6): 1768 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rizos, P. Lonergan, M.P. Boland, R. Arroyo-Garcia, B. Pintado, J. d. l. Fuente, and A. Gutierrez-Adan Analysis of Differential Messenger RNA Expression Between Bovine Blastocysts Produced in Different Culture Systems: Implications for Blastocyst Quality Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 589 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Viuff, P. J.M. Hendriksen, P. L.A.M. Vos, S. J. Dieleman, B. M. Bibby, T. Greve, P. Hyttel, and P. D. Thomsen Chromosomal Abnormalities and Developmental Kinetics in In Vivo-Developed Cattle Embryos at Days 2 to 5 after Ovulation Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 204 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Viuff, T. Greve, B. Avery, P. Hyttel, P. B. Brockhoff, and P. D. Thomsen Chromosome Aberrations in In Vitro-Produced Bovine Embryos at Days 2-5 Post-Insemination Biol Reprod, October 1, 2000; 63(4): 1143 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. Slimane, Y. Heyman, Y. Lavergne, P. Humblot, and J. P. Renard Assessing Chromosomal Abnormalities in Two-Cell Bovine In Vitro-Fertilized Embryos by Using Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization with Three Different Cloned Probes Biol Reprod, March 1, 2000; 62(3): 628 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |