Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dale, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dale, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Boni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dale, B.
Biology of Reproduction 61, 1050-1055 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Intercellular Communication in In Vivo- and In Vitro-Produced Bovine Embryos

R. Boni1,a, E. Tostib, S. Roviellob, and B. Daleb

a Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali, 85100 Potenza, Italy b Stazione Zoologica `Anton Dohrn', Villa Comunale, 80121 Napoli, Italy

In vivo bovine embryos were obtained by nonsurgical flushing of uterine horns of cows submitted to superovulatory treatment, while in vitro embryos were generated from oocytes collected from slaughtered donors. Lucifer Yellow injected into single blastomeres did not diffuse into neighboring cells until the morula stage in in vivo embryos and the blastocyst stage in in vitro embryos. In both cases diffusion was limited to a few cells. In contrast, diffusion was extensive in microsurgically isolated inner cell mass (ICM) but absent in the trophectoderm (TE). At the blastocyst stage, diffusion was always more extensive in in vivo than in in vitro embryos. Ultrastructural analyses confirmed these functional observations, and gap junction-like structures were observed at the blastocyst stage. These structures were diffuse in the ICM of in vivo embryos, scarce in the ICM of in vitro embryos and in the TE of in vivo embryos, and not observed in the TE of in vitro embryos. Blastomeres at all stages of development from the 2-cell stage to the blastocyst stage in in vitro embryos and at the morula and blastocyst stage in in vivo embryos were electrically coupled, and the junctional conductance (Gj) decreased in in vitro embryos from 4.18 ± 1.70 nS (2-cell stage) to 0.37 ± 0.12 nS (blastocyst stage). At each developmental stage, in vivo embryos showed a significantly (P < 0.05) higher Gj than in vitro-produced embryos. Moreover, a significantly (P < 0.01) higher Gj was found in isolated ICM than in the respective blastocyst in both in vivo- and in vitro-produced embryos (3.5 ± 1.4 vs. 0.7 ± 0.3 and 2.6 ± 1.6 vs. 0.37 ± 0.12 nS, respectively). The electrical coupling in absence of dye coupling in the early bovine embryo agrees with observations for embryos from other phyla. The late and reduced expression of intercellular communicative devices in in vitro-produced embryos may be one of the factors explaining their developmental low efficiency.

1 Correspondence: R. Boni, Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali, Via N. Sauro, 85, 85100 Potenza, Italy. FAX: 39 0971 470719; boni{at}unibas.it




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Gomez, A. Gutierrez-Adan, C. Diez, P. Bermejo-Alvarez, M. Munoz, A. Rodriguez, J. Otero, M. Alvarez-Viejo, D. Martin, S. Carrocera, et al.
Biological differences between in vitro produced bovine embryos and parthenotes
Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 285 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D Corcoran, T Fair, S Park, D Rizos, O V Patel, G W Smith, P M Coussens, J J Ireland, M P Boland, A C O Evans, et al.
Suppressed expression of genes involved in transcription and translation in in vitro compared with in vivo cultured bovine embryos.
Reproduction, April 1, 2006; 131(4): 651 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. M. Rivera, K. L. Kelley, G. W. Erdos, and P. J. Hansen
Alterations in Ultrastructural Morphology of Two-Cell Bovine Embryos Produced In Vitro and In Vivo Following a Physiologically Relevant Heat Shock
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2068 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Lonergan, D. Rizos, A. Gutierrez-Adan, P.M. Moreira, B. Pintado, J. de la Fuente, and M.P. Boland
Temporal Divergence in the Pattern of Messenger RNA Expression in Bovine Embryos Cultured from the Zygote to Blastocyst Stage In Vitro or In Vivo
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1424 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Wrenzycki, D. Herrmann, and H. Niemann
Timing of Blastocyst Expansion Affects Spatial Messenger RNA Expression Patterns of Genes in Bovine Blastocysts Produced In Vitro
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2073 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Rizos, A. Gutierrez-Adan, S. Perez-Garnelo, J. de la Fuente, M.P. Boland, and P. Lonergan
Bovine Embryo Culture in the Presence or Absence of Serum: Implications for Blastocyst Development, Cryotolerance, and Messenger RNA Expression
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 236 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Rizos, P. Lonergan, M.P. Boland, R. Arroyo-Garcia, B. Pintado, J. d. l. Fuente, and A. Gutierrez-Adan
Analysis of Differential Messenger RNA Expression Between Bovine Blastocysts Produced in Different Culture Systems: Implications for Blastocyst Quality
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 589 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Boni, A. Cuomo, and E. Tosti
Developmental Potential in Bovine Oocytes Is Related to Cumulus-Oocyte Complex Grade, Calcium Current Activity, and Calcium Stores
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 836 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
E. Tosti, R. Boni, and A. Cuomo
Ca2+ current activity decreases during meiotic progression in bovine oocytes
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): C1795 - C1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.