HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gastal, E.L. Articles by Ginther, O.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gastal, E.L. Articles by Ginther, O.J. Agricola Articles by Gastal, E.L. Articles by Ginther, O.J.

Role of Luteinizing Hormone in Follicle Deviation Based on Manipulating Progesterone Concentrations in Mares¹

^a Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 ^b Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University, Araç;t1tuba, SP 16050-680, Brazil ^c Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil

The effects of several doses of progesterone on FSH and LH concentrations were used to study the role of the gonadotropins on deviation in growth rates of the two largest follicles during the establishment of follicle dominance. Progesterone was given to pony mares at a daily dose rate of 0 mg (controls), 30 mg (low dose), 100 mg (intermediate dose), and 300 mg (high dose). All follicles 6 mm were ablated at Day 10 (Day 0 = ovulation) to initiate a new follicular wave; prostaglandin F₂ was given to induce luteolysis, and progesterone was given from Days 10 to 24. The low dose did not significantly alter any of the ovarian or gonadotropin end points. The high dose reduced (P < 0.05) the ablation-induced FSH concentrations on Day 11. Maximum diameter of the largest follicle (17.2 ± 0.6 mm) and the second-largest follicle (15.5 ± 0.9 mm) in the high-dose group was less (P < 0.04) than the diameter of the second-largest follicle in the controls (20.0 ± 1.0 mm) at the beginning of deviation (Day 16.7 ± 0.4). Thus, the growth of the two largest follicles was reduced by the high dose, presumably through depression of FSH, so that the follicles did not attain a diameter characteristic of deviation in the controls. The intermediate dose did not affect FSH concentrations. However, the LH concentrations increased in the control, low, and intermediate groups, but then decreased (P < 0.05) in the intermediate group to pretreatment levels. The LH decrease in the intermediate group occurred 2 days before deviation in the controls. The maximum diameter of the largest follicle was less (P < 0.0001) in the intermediate group (27.3 ± 1.8 mm) than in the controls (38.9 ± 1.5 mm), but the maximum diameter of the second-largest follicle was not different between the two groups (19.0 ± 1.1 vs. 20.3 ± 1.0 mm). Thus, the onset of deviation, as assessed by the second-largest follicle, was not delayed by the decrease in LH. Diameter of the largest follicle by Day 18 in the intermediate group (23.1 ± 1.6 mm) was less (P < 0.05) than in the controls (28.0 ± 1.0 mm). These results suggest that circulating LH was not involved in the initiation of dominance (inhibition of other follicles by the largest follicle) but was required for the continued growth of the largest follicle after or concurrently with its initial expression of dominance.

¹ Research supported by Equiservices Publishing and by EquiCulture, Inc., Cross Plains, Wisconsin. E.L.G. and M.O.G. were supported by the Federal University of Viçosa and by a CAPES scholarship, Brazil, and G.P.N. was supported by FAPESP (#98-00287-6), Brazil.

² Correspondence: O.J. Ginther, Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1656 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706. FAX: 608 262 7420; ojg{at}ahabs.wisc.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O.J Ginther, M.D Utt, M.A Beg, E.L Gastal, and M.O Gastal Negative Effect of Estradiol on Luteinizing Hormone Throughout the Ovulatory Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Mares Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 543 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O.J. Ginther, E.L. Gastal, M.O. Gastal, and M.A. Beg Regulation of Circulating Gonadotropins by the Negative Effects of Ovarian Hormones in Mares Biol Reprod, August 1, 2005; 73(2): 315 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.J. Acosta, E.L. Gastal, M.O. Gastal, M.A. Beg, and O.J. Ginther Differential Blood Flow Changes Between the Future Dominant and Subordinate Follicles Precede Diameter Changes During Follicle Selection in Mares Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 502 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Baerwald, G. P. Adams, and R. A. Pierson Characterization of Ovarian Follicular Wave Dynamics in Women Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 1023 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O.J. Ginther, M.A. Beg, D.R. Bergfelt, F.X. Donadeu, and K. Kot Follicle Selection in Monovular Species Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 638 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.R. Bergfelt, E.L. Gastal, and O.J. Ginther Response of Estradiol and Inhibin to Experimentally Reduced Luteinizing Hormone During Follicle Deviation in Mares Biol Reprod, August 1, 2001; 65(2): 426 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O.J. Ginther, D.R. Bergfelt, M.A. Beg, and K. Kot Follicle Selection in Cattle: Role of Luteinizing Hormone Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 197 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				O.J. Ginther, D.R. Bergfelt, L.J. Kulick, and K. Kot Selection of the Dominant Follicle in Cattle: Role of Estradiol Biol Reprod, August 1, 2000; 63(2): 383 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text]