Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mann, K. I.
Right arrow Articles by Dias, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mann, K. I.
Right arrow Articles by Dias, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mann, K. I.
Right arrow Articles by Dias, J. A.
Biology of Reproduction 62, 1240-1247 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Deletion of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Receptor Residues Encoded by Exon One Decreases FSH Binding and Signaling in the Rat1

Kathrin I. Manna, Xunxian Liub, and James A. Dias,c

a Department of Biological Sciences, and b Department of Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12208 c Wadsworth Center, David Axelrod Institute for Public Health, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12208

The rat FSH receptor (rFSHR) shares considerable homology with the rat LH receptor (rLHR), yet binds human FSH (hFSH) with high fidelity, suggesting that the binding determinant encoded by the rFSHR gene shares no homology with the analogous rLHR primary sequence, thereby affording specificity of ligand binding. Two such regions of primary sequence have been previously identified and studied by peptide challenge tests and immunoneutralization studies. We therefore implemented site-directed mutagenesis to delete the regions S9-N30 and D300-F315 of the mature rFSHR sequence. The mutant receptor ({Delta}rFSHR) cDNAs were expressed in insect cells. The large deletion {Delta}rFSHRS9-N30 and a smaller deletion, {Delta}rFSHRS9-S18, did not bind 125I-hFSH. However, {Delta}rFSHRK19-R29 and {Delta}rFSHRD300-F315 bound 125I-hFSH with an affinity indistinguishable from wild-type rFSHR. The deletion mutants {Delta}rFSHR S9-N30 or {Delta}rFSHRS9-S18 were not detectable on the cell surface by flow cytometry unless cells were sheared. Although 125I-hFSH binding to {Delta}rFSHRK19-R29 was normal, this form of the receptor was defective for signal transduction whereas {Delta}rFSHRD300-F315 was not. Furthermore, neither region seems to be a specificity determinant, since their removal did not result in high-affinity binding of hCG to {Delta}rFSHR.

First decision: 4 January 1999.

1 Supported by NIH HD-18407. This study was conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at the University at Albany, Albany, NY (K.I.M.).

2 Correspondence: James A. Dias, Wadsworth Center, David Axelrod Institute for Public Health, New York State Department of Health, 120 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208. FAX: 518 474 5978; james.dias{at}wadsworth.org




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
P. Thiruppathi, S. Shatavi, J.A. Dias, E. Radwanska, and J.L. Luborsky
Gonadotrophin receptor expression on human granulosa cells of low and normal responders to FSH
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 697 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.