Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Kot, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Kot, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Kot, K.
Biology of Reproduction 63, 383-389 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular article

Selection of the Dominant Follicle in Cattle: Role of Estradiol1

O.J. Ginther2,a, D.R. Bergfelta, L.J. Kulicka, and K. Kota

a Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

ABSTRACT

Involvement of estradiol in the deviation in growth rates between the two largest follicles of a wave was studied in 39 heifers. In experiment 1, the largest follicle remained intact in a control group and was ablated in five estradiol-treated groups when the largest follicle reached 8.5 mm or larger (expected beginning of deviation; Hour 0). The ablation groups were given a single injection of 0, 0.004, 0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 mg of estradiol. Blood samples were taken from a jugular vein every hour at Hours 0 to 16. By Hour 8, FSH concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in the ablation group that received 0 mg of estradiol than in the controls. Among the estradiol groups, that receiving 0.02 mg had the lowest detectable increase in estradiol. In this group, FSH concentrations were not suppressed below the control concentrations, but the increase in FSH concentrations following ablation of the largest follicle was delayed for 2 or 3 h. This delay in the increase of FSH concentrations corresponded to the hours that estradiol was maximal. In experiment 2, blood samples were taken every 4 h from the caudal vena cava cranial to the junction with the ovarian veins in heifers with the largest follicle intact (controls) or ablated at 8.5 mm or larger (Hour 0). Averaged over Hours 4 to 48, estradiol concentrations were higher (P < 0.04) in the controls than in the ablation group. During Hours 0 to 12, estradiol concentrations increased (P < 0.05) in the controls, whereas FSH concentrations decreased (P < 0.05). In the ablation group, estradiol concentrations were lower than in the controls by Hour 4, and FSH concentrations increased (P < 0.05) between Hours 4 and 12. These results support the hypothesis that the largest follicle releases increased estradiol into the blood at the beginning of follicular deviation, and that the released estradiol is involved in the continuing depression of FSH concentrations to below the requirement of the smaller follicles.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 25 February 2000.

1 Supported by the University of Wisconsin, Madison; U.S. Department of Agriculture grant 99-35203-7669; and by Equiservices Publishing and the Eutherian Foundation, Cross Plains, WI.

2 Correspondence: O.J. Ginther, Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Science, 1656 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706. FAX: 608 262 7420; ojg{at}ahabs.wisc.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. A. Perry and B. L. Perry
Effects of standing estrus and supplemental estradiol on changes in uterine pH during a fixed-time artificial insemination protocol
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 2928 - 2935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J Ginther, M.D Utt, M.A Beg, E.L Gastal, and M.O Gastal
Negative Effect of Estradiol on Luteinizing Hormone Throughout the Ovulatory Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Mares
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 543 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Lopez, R. Sartori, and M. C. Wiltbank
Reproductive Hormones and Follicular Growth During Development of One or Multiple Dominant Follicles in Cattle
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 788 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. Sisco, L. J. Hagemann, A. N. Shelling, and P. L. Pfeffer
Isolation of Genes Differentially Expressed in Dominant and Subordinate Bovine Follicles
Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 3904 - 3913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, M.A. Beg, K. Kot, C. Meira, and D.R. Bergfelt
Associated and Independent Comparisons Between the Two Largest Follicles Preceding Follicle Deviation in Cattle
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2003; 68(2): 524 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, M.A. Beg, D.R. Bergfelt, and K. Kot
Activin A, Estradiol, and Free Insulin-Like Growth Factor I in Follicular Fluid Preceding the Experimental Assumption of Follicle Dominance in Cattle
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2002; 67(1): 14 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F.X. Donadeu and O.J. Ginther
Changes in Concentrations of Follicular Fluid Factors During Follicle Selection in Mares
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1111 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, M.A. Beg, D.R. Bergfelt, F.X. Donadeu, and K. Kot
Follicle Selection in Monovular Species
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 638 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.E. Fortune, G.M. Rivera, A.C.O. Evans, and A.M. Turzillo
Differentiation of Dominant Versus Subordinate Follicles in Cattle
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 648 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L.J. Kulick, D.R. Bergfelt, K. Kot, and O.J. Ginther
Follicle Selection in Cattle: Follicle Deviation and Codominance Within Sequential Waves
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 839 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, D.R. Bergfelt, M.A. Beg, and K. Kot
Follicle Selection in Cattle: Relationships among Growth Rate, Diameter Ranking, and Capacity for Dominance
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2001; 65(2): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D.R. Bergfelt, E.L. Gastal, and O.J. Ginther
Response of Estradiol and Inhibin to Experimentally Reduced Luteinizing Hormone During Follicle Deviation in Mares
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2001; 65(2): 426 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G.M. Rivera and J.E. Fortune
Development of Codominant Follicles in Cattle Is Associated with a Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-Dependent Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-4 Protease
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 112 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M.A. Beg, D.R. Bergfelt, K. Kot, M.C. Wiltbank, and O.J. Ginther
Follicular-Fluid Factors and Granulosa-Cell Gene Expression Associated with Follicle Deviation in Cattle
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2001; 64(2): 432 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, D.R. Bergfelt, M.A. Beg, and K. Kot
Follicle Selection in Cattle: Role of Luteinizing Hormone
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 197 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.