HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Piotrowska, K. Articles by Karasiewicz, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Piotrowska, K. Articles by Karasiewicz, J. Agricola Articles by Piotrowska, K. Articles by Karasiewicz, J.

Effects of Preactivation of Ooplasts or Synchronization of Blastomere Nuclei in G1 on Preimplantation Development of Rabbit Serial Nuclear Transfer Embryos¹

Jacek A. Modliski^2,a

^a Department of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-551 Mroków, Poland

ABSTRACT

Blastomeres from eight-cell-stage rabbit embryos have been fused with enucleated metaphase II oocytes (ooplasts) or with ooplasts that were preactivated before fusion. Preactivation of ooplasts before nuclear transfer (NT) raises the rate of preimplantation development from 15% to 56%, which remains elevated in the next series of NT (48.6% and 47.2% in the second and third rounds, respectively). Transfer of eight-cell embryos from the third round to the recipient resulted in the birth of normal young. Synchronization of blastomere nuclei in the G1 phase with nocodazole before fusion results in 42% morula/blastocyst formation. However, in the second generation of NT embryos, the yield drops to as low as 17%, indicating deleterious effects of the second nocodazole treatment on blastomeres. The calculated number of clones per one round of cloning was 4.5, 3.9, and 3.8 in subsequent series; the highest number of morulae and blastocysts that developed from individual donor embryos after three rounds were 26 and 27, respectively.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 2 February 2000.

¹ Financed by grant 5 PO6D 01910 from the Committee for Scientific Research.

² Correspondence. FAX: 4822 756 1699; panighz{at}atos.warman.com.pl

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Popova, M. Bader, and A. Krivokharchenko Full-Term Development of Rat after Transfer of Nuclei from Two-Cell Stage Embryos Biol Reprod, October 1, 2006; 75(4): 524 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Novak, F. Paradis, C. Savard, K. Tremblay, and M.-A. Sirard Identification of Porcine Oocyte Proteins That Are Associated with Somatic Cell Nuclei after Co-Incubation Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1279 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Mitalipov, R. R. Yeoman, K. D. Nusser, and D. P. Wolf Rhesus Monkey Embryos Produced by Nuclear Transfer from Embryonic Blastomeres or Somatic Cells Biol Reprod, May 1, 2002; 66(5): 1367 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text]