Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koo, D.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Biology of Reproduction 63, 986-992 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


ARTICLES

In Vitro Development of Reconstructed Porcine Oocytes after Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1

Deog-Bon Kooa, Yong-Kook Kanga, Young-Hee Choia, Jung Sun Parka, Sun-Kyung Hana, In Young Parka, Sun-Uk Kima, Kyung-Kwang Leea, Dong-Soo Sonb, Won-Kyong Changc, and Yong-Mahn Han2,,a

a Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Yusong, Taejon 305-600, Korea b National Livestock Research Institute, Chonan 330-800, c Suwon 441-350, Korea

This study was designed to examine the developmental ability of porcine embryos after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Porcine fibroblasts were isolated from fetuses at Day 40 of gestation. In vitro-matured porcine oocytes were enucleated and electrically fused with somatic cells. The reconstructed eggs were activated using electrical stimulus and cultured in vitro for 6 days. Nuclear-transferred (NT) embryos activated at a field strength of 120 V/mm (11.6 ± 1.6%) showed a higher developmental rate as compared to the 150-V/mm group (6.5 ± 2.3%) (P < 0.05), but the mean cell numbers of blastocysts were similar between the two groups. Rates of blastocyst development from NT embryos electrically pulsed at different times (2, 4, and 6 h) after electrofusion were 11.6 ± 2.9, 6.6 ± 2.3, and 8.1 ± 3.3%, respectively. The mean cell numbers of blastocysts developed from NT embryos were gradually decreased (30.4 ± 10.4 > 24.6 ± 10.1 > 16.5 ± 7.4 per blastocyst) as exposure time (2, 4, and 6 h) of nuclei to oocyte cytoplast before activation was prolonged. There was a significant difference in the cell number between the 2- and 6-h groups (P < 0.05). Nuclear-transferred embryos (9.4 ± 0.9%) had a lower developmental rate than in vitro fertilization (IVF)-derived (21.4 ± 1.9%) or parthenogenetic embryos (22.4 ± 7.2%) (P < 0.01). The mean cell number (28.9 ± 11.4) of NT-derived blastocysts was smaller than that (38.6 ± 10.4) of IVF-derived blastocysts (P < 0.05) and was similar to that (29.9 ± 12.1) of parthenogenetic embryos. Our results suggest that porcine NT eggs using somatic cells after electrical activation have developmental potential to the blastocyst stage, although with smaller cell numbers compared to IVF embryos.

First decision: 22 March 2000.

1 This study was supported by grants (HS2705 and HS2550) of Ministry of Science and Technology.

2 Correspondence: Yong-Mahn Han, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 115, Yusong, Taejon 305-600, Korea. FAX: 82 42 860 4608; ymhan{at}kribb4680.kribb.re.kr




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. H El Shourbagy, E. C Spikings, M. Freitas, and J. C St John
Mitochondria directly influence fertilisation outcome in the pig
Reproduction, February 1, 2006; 131(2): 233 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. H. Lee, D. Y. Kim, D. H. Nam, S. H. Hyun, G. S. Lee, H. S. Kim, C.-K. Lee, S. K. Kang, B. C. Lee, and W. S. Hwang
Role of Messenger RNA Expression of Platelet Activating Factor and Its Receptor in Porcine In Vitro-Fertilized and Cloned Embryo Development
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 919 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Hao, L. Lai, J. Mao, G.-S. Im, A. Bonk, and R. S. Prather
Apoptosis and In Vitro Development of Preimplantation Porcine Embryos Derived In Vitro or by Nuclear Transfer
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D.-B. Koo, Y.-K. Kang, Y.-H. Choi, J. S. Park, H.-N. Kim, K. B. Oh, D.-S. Son, H. Park, K.-K. Lee, and Y.-M. Han
Aberrant Allocations of Inner Cell Mass and Trophectoderm Cells in Bovine Nuclear Transfer Blastocysts
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 487 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Miyoshi, S. J. Rzucidlo, S. L. Pratt, and S. L. Stice
Utility of Rapidly Matured Oocytes as Recipients for Production of Cloned Embryos from Somatic Cells in the Pig
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 540 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. A. De Sousa, J. R. Dobrinsky, J. Zhu, A. L. Archibald, A. Ainslie, W. Bosma, J. Bowering, J. Bracken, P. M. Ferrier, J. Fletcher, et al.
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Pig: Control of Pronuclear Formation and Integration with Improved Methods for Activation and Maintenance of Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 642 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K.-W. Park, L. Lai, H.-T. Cheong, G.-S. Im, Q.-Y. Sun, G. Wu, B. N. Day, and R. S. Prather
Developmental Potential of Porcine Nuclear Transfer Embryos Derived from Transgenic Fetal Fibroblasts Infected with the Gene for the Green Fluorescent Protein: Comparison of Different Fusion/Activation Conditions
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2001; 65(6): 1681 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-K. Kang, D.-B. Koo, J. S. Park, Y.-H. Choi, H.-N. Kim, W.-K. Chang, K.-K. Lee, and Y.-M. Han
Typical Demethylation Events in Cloned Pig Embryos. CLUES ON SPECIES-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN EPIGENETIC REPROGRAMMING OF A CLONED DONOR GENOME
J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 39980 - 39984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.