Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martín, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Simón, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martín, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Simón, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Martín, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Simón, C.
Biology of Reproduction 63, 1370-1376 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Increased Adhesiveness in Cultured Endometrial-Derived Cells Is Related to the Absence of Moesin Expression1

Julio C. Martínb, Melinda J. Jasperb, Diana Valbuenab, Marcos Meseguerb,c, José Remohíb,c, Antonio Pellicerb,c, and Carlos Simón2,,b,c

b Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Research Department (FIVIER), Valencia 46020, Spain c Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Valencia University, Valencia 46010, Spain

ABSTRACT

Human endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) are nonadhesive for embryos throughout most of the menstrual cycle. During the so-called implantation window, the apical plasma membrane of EECs acquire adhesive properties by undergoing a series of morphological and biochemical changes. The human endometrial-derived epithelial cell line, RL95-2, serves as an in vitro model for receptive uterine epithelium because of its high adhesiveness for trophoblast-derived cells. In contrast, the HEC-1-A cell line, which displays poor adhesive properties for trophoblast cells, is considered to be less receptive. The ezrin, radixin, and moesin protein family members, which are present underneath the apical plasma membrane, potentially act to link the cytoskeleton and membrane proteins. In the present study, we have further investigated the adhesive features in these two unrelated endometrial-derived cell lines using an established in vitro model for embryonic adhesion. We have also analyzed the protein pattern and mRNA expression of ezrin and moesin in RL95-2 cells versus HEC-1-A cells. The results demonstrate that RL95-2 cells were indeed more receptive (81% blastocyst adhesion) compared with HEC-1-A cells (46% blastocyst adhesion). An intermediate adhesion rate was found in primary EECs cultured on extracellular matrix gel, thus allowing a partial polarization of these cells (67% blastocyst adhesion). Furthermore, we found that moesin was absent from RL95-2 cells. In contrast, ezrin is expressed in both cell lines, yet it is reduced in adherent RL95-2 cells. Data are in agreement with the hypothesis that uterine receptivity requires down-regulation or absence of moesin, which is a less-polarized actin cytoskeleton.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 31 January 2000.

1 Supported by the Spanish Government, grant FISs 98/0855.

2 Correspondence: Carlos Simón, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, c/ Guardia Civil, 23, Valencia 46020, Spain. FAX: 34 96 3694735; csimon{at}interbook.net




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Dominguez, T. Garrido-Gomez, J.A. Lopez, E. Camafeita, A. Quinonero, A. Pellicer, and C. Simon
Proteomic analysis of the human receptive versus non-receptive endometrium using differential in-gel electrophoresis and MALDI-MS unveils stathmin 1 and annexin A2 as differentially regulated
Hum. Reprod., June 25, 2009; (2009) dep230v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tapia, L. M. Gangi, F. Zegers-Hochschild, J. Balmaceda, R. Pommer, L. Trejo, I. M. Pacheco, A. M. Salvatierra, S. Henriquez, M. Quezada, et al.
Differences in the endometrial transcript profile during the receptive period between women who were refractory to implantation and those who achieved pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 340 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. Diedrich, B.C.J.M. Fauser, P. Devroey, G. Griesinger, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR)
The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 365 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
T. Strowitzki, A. Germeyer, R. Popovici, and M. von Wolff
The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 617 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
F. Dominguez, M. Yanez-Mo, F. Sanchez-Madrid, and C. Simon
Embryonic implantation and leukocyte transendothelial migration: different processes with similar players?
FASEB J, July 1, 2005; 19(9): 1056 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. Riesewijk, J. Martin, R. van Os, J. A. Horcajadas, J. Polman, A. Pellicer, S. Mosselman, and C. Simon
Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+2 versus LH+7 by microarray technology
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 9(5): 253 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Dominguez, S. Avila, A. Cervero, J. Martin, A. Pellicer, J. L. Castrillo, and C. Simon
A Combined Approach for Gene Discovery Identifies Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-Related Protein 1 as a New Gene Implicated in Human Endometrial Receptivity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 1849 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
F. Dominguez, A. Galan, J. J. L. Martin, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and C. Simon
Hormonal and embryonic regulation of chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR4, CCR5 and CCR2B in the human endometrium and the human blastocyst
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 9(4): 189 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. Heneweer, L. H. Kruse, F. Kindhauser, M. Schmidt, K. H. Jakobs, H.-W. Denker, and M. Thie
Adhesiveness of human uterine epithelial RL95-2 cells to trophoblast: Rho protein regulation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1014 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.