Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crosier, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Farin, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crosier, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Farin, C. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Crosier, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Farin, C. E.
Biology of Reproduction 64, 1375-1385 (2001)
© 2001 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Ultrastructural Morphometry of Bovine Blastocysts Produced In Vivo or In Vitro1

Adrienne E. Crosiera, Peter W. Farinb, Michael J. Dykstrab, Joseph E. Alexandera, and Charlotte E. Farin2,,c,a

a Departments of Animal Science, b Farm Animal Health and Resource Managment, and c Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7621

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the ultrastructure of bovine blastocysts produced in vivo or in vitro by using morphometric analysis. Blastocysts produced in vivo (multiple ovulations, MO) were obtained from superovulated Holstein cows. For blastocysts produced in vitro, cumulus-oocyte complexes aspirated from ovaries of Holstein cows were matured and fertilized in vitro. At 20 h postinsemination (hpi), zygotes were distributed into one of three culture media: 1) IVPS (in vitro produced with serum): TCM-199 + 10% estrous cow serum (ECS); 2) IVPSR (in vitro produced with serum restriction): TCM-199 + 1% BSA until 72 hpi, followed by TCM-199 + 10% ECS from 72 to 168 hpi; and 3) mSOF (modified synthetic oviductal fluid): mSOF + 0.6% BSA. At 168 hpi, six or seven grade 1 blastocysts from each of the four treatments (MO, IVPS, IVPSR, and mSOF) were fixed and prepared for transmission electron microscopy. Random micrographs of each blastocyst were used to determine the volume density of cellular components. Overall, as blastocysts progressed in development, the volume densities of cytoplasm and intercellular space decreased (P < 0.05) and the volume densities of mature mitochondria, nuclei, blastocoele, and apoptotic bodies increased (P < 0.05). Across treatments, the proportional volumes of nuclei and inclusion bodies were increased in inner cell mass cells compared with trophectoderm cells for mid- and expanded blastocysts. For blastocysts produced in vitro, the volume density of mitochondria was decreased (P < 0.05) as compared with that of blastocycts produced in vivo. The proportional volume of vacuoles was increased (P < 0.05) in blastocysts from the mSOF treatment as compared with blastocysts produced in vivo. For mid- and expanded blastocysts from all three in vitro treatments, the volume density of lipid increased (P < 0.05) and the volume density of nuclei decreased (P < 0.05) compared with those of blastocysts produced in vivo. In conclusion, blastocysts produced in vitro possessed deviations in volume densities of organelles associated with cellular metabolism as well as deviations associated with altered embryonic differentiation. However, the specific nature of these deviations varied with the type of culture conditions used for in vitro embryo production.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 22 August 2000.

1 Supported by USDA Grant 9602482 and the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service.

2 Correspondence: Charlotte E. Farin, Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7621, 231B Polk Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695-7621. FAX: 919 515 7780; char_farin{at}ncsu.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
N. I Alexopoulos, P. Maddox-Hyttel, P. Tveden-Nyborg, N. T D'Cruz, T. R Tecirlioglu, M. A Cooney, K. Schauser, M. K Holland, and A. J French
Developmental disparity between in vitro-produced and somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine days 14 and 21 embryos: implications for embryonic loss
Reproduction, October 1, 2008; 136(4): 433 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
G. Giritharan, S. Talbi, A. Donjacour, F. Di Sebastiano, A. T Dobson, and P. F Rinaudo
Effect of in vitro fertilization on gene expression and development of mouse preimplantation embryos
Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 63 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. R. Herrick, J. B. Bond, G. M. Magarey, H. L. Bateman, R. L. Krisher, S. A. Dunford, and W. F. Swanson
Toward a Feline-Optimized Culture Medium: Impact of Ions, Carbohydrates, Essential Amino Acids, Vitamins, and Serum on Development and Metabolism of In Vitro Fertilization-Derived Feline Embryos Relative to Embryos Grown In Vivo
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 858 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R G Sturmey, P J O'Toole, and H J Leese
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of mitochondrial:lipid association in the porcine oocyte.
Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 829 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D Corcoran, T Fair, S Park, D Rizos, O V Patel, G W Smith, P M Coussens, J J Ireland, M P Boland, A C O Evans, et al.
Suppressed expression of genes involved in transcription and translation in in vitro compared with in vivo cultured bovine embryos.
Reproduction, April 1, 2006; 131(4): 651 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. R. Miles, C. E. Farin, K. F. Rodriguez, J. E. Alexander, and P. W. Farin
Effects of Embryo Culture on Angiogenesis and Morphometry of Bovine Placentas During Early Gestation
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 663 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. E. Farin, P. W. Farin, and J. A. Piedrahita
Development of fetuses from in vitro-produced and cloned bovine embryos
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E53 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. M. Rivera, K. L. Kelley, G. W. Erdos, and P. J. Hansen
Alterations in Ultrastructural Morphology of Two-Cell Bovine Embryos Produced In Vitro and In Vivo Following a Physiologically Relevant Heat Shock
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2068 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Rizos, A. Gutierrez-Adan, S. Perez-Garnelo, J. de la Fuente, M.P. Boland, and P. Lonergan
Bovine Embryo Culture in the Presence or Absence of Serum: Implications for Blastocyst Development, Cryotolerance, and Messenger RNA Expression
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 236 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.