Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keskintepe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keskintepe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keskintepe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Biology of Reproduction 65, 407-411 (2001)
© 2001 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Use of Cryopreserved Pronuclear Embryos for the Production of Transgenic Mice

Levent Keskintepea, Yuksel Agcab, Gabriela A. Pacholczyka, Anna Machnickaa, and John K. Critserb

a Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912 b Cryobiology Research Institute, Wells Research Center, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202

ABSTRACT

A series of experiments was conducted to test the hypothesis that an improved cryopreservation protocol for pronuclear stage mouse embryos will produce transgenic (Tg) mice by pronuclear gene injection at a rate not significantly different from noncryopreserved embryos. In the first experiment, three cryoprotective agents (CPAs) (dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO], propylene glycol [PG], ethylene glycol [EG]) and two cryopreservation protocols, currently used for pronuclear embryos, were compared in regard to their ability to maintain post-thaw morphological integrity and in vitro developmental competence. In the second and third experiments, the optimal cryopreservation protocol determined from the first experiment was used to evaluate in vitro developmental competence of pronuclear embryos following green fluorescence protein gene injection and in vivo developmental competence as well as the gene integration rates. Survival (morphological integrity and development to two cells) of embryos cryopreserved in the presence of DMSO was higher (P < 0.05) than those cryopreserved with either PG or EG. Postinjection developmental competence (development to two cells) of cryopreserved CBA, C57B6/JxCBA-F1 and noncryopreserved (control) embryos was not different (P > 0.05). Postinjection blastocyst formation rate of cryopreserved and noncryopreserved C57B6/JxCBA-F1 embryos was similar (P > 0.05); however, noncryopreserved CBA embryos resulted in a higher blastocyst formation than controls (P < 0.05). While there was no difference in the percentage of transgenic fetuses between cryopreserved and control CBA embryos (P > 0.05), cryopreserved C57B6/JxCBA-F1 embryos resulted in lower transgenic fetuses than control (P < 0.05). These results indicate that the use of cryopreserved mouse pronuclear embryos can be a useful and efficient approach to the production of Tg mice.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 17 October 2000.

1 Correspondence: John K. Critser, Cryobiology Research Institute, The Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Riley Hospital for Children, 1044 West Walnut Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202. FAX: 317 274 8679; jcritser{at}iupui.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Somfai, M. Ozawa, J. Noguchi, H. Kaneko, M. Nakai, N. Maedomari, J. Ito, N. Kashiwazaki, T. Nagai, and K. Kikuchi
Live Piglets Derived from In Vitro-Produced Zygotes Vitrified at the Pronuclear Stage
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.