| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Regular Article |
a Departments of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology,
b Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
ABSTRACT
We studied the morphological and quantitative changes in cyclic corpora lutea (CCL) and in CL of pregnancy (CLP) during structural luteolysis. Elimination of CCL takes several cycles, and cell death occurs as successive apoptotic bursts, from 2100 h in proestrus to 1300 h in estrus. Each apoptotic burst determined a 60% decrease in the CL volume and an 80% decrease in the number of steroidogenic cells (SC). All these changes were inhibited by blocking the preovulatory prolactin (PRL) surge with bromocryptine (CB154). Neither apoptotic cells nor changes in the number of SC were found in regressing CLP from Day 21 of pregnancy to Day 2 postpartum, although there was a 50% decrease in the CLP volume and a 30% decrease in the mean cross-sectional area of SC. Treatment with CB154 on the day of parturition did not modify these regressive changes. On Day 5 postpartum, the volume of the CLP and the number of SC were equivalent in lactating rats (showing high PRL concentrations induced by pup suckling) and nonlactating noncycling rats (in which cyclicity and, therefore PRL surges, were blocked by treatment with LHRH antagonist). However, on Day 10 postpartum, the CLP volume and the number of SC were significantly decreased in lactating rats, and apoptotic cells were frequent. In postpartum cycling rats, the CLP did not show apoptotic cells on the day of the second postpartum estrus (on Day 5 postpartum), whereas on the day of the third postpartum estrus (on Day 9 postpartum), apoptotic cells were abundant. These results indicate that PRL does not induce apoptosis in the CLP before Day 5 postpartum and strongly suggest that the proapoptotic effect of PRL is dependent on the degree of differentiation of luteal cells.
First decision: 6 February 2001.
1 This work has been subsidized by grants 1FD97-1065-CO3-03 and PM98-0167 from the Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Cientifica, Spain.
2 Correspondence. FAX: 34 57 218288; fi1sacrj{at}lucano.uco.es
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Gonzalez-Fernandez, E. Martinez-Galisteo, F. Gaytan, J. A. Barcena, and J. E. Sanchez-Criado Changes in the Proteome of Functional and Regressing Corpus Luteum During Pregnancy and Lactation in the Rat Biol Reprod, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 100 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans? Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A Goyeneche, J. M Harmon, and C. M Telleria Cell death induced by serum deprivation in luteal cells involves the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis Reproduction, January 1, 2006; 131(1): 103 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R Gonzalez-Fernandez, F Gaytan, E Martinez-Galisteo, P Porras, C A Padilla, J E Sanchez Criado, and J A Barcena Expression of glutaredoxin (thioltransferase) in the rat ovary during the oestrous cycle and postnatal development J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 625 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Takiguchi, N. Sugino, K. Esato, A. Karube-Harada, A. Sakata, Y. Nakamura, H. Ishikawa, and H. Kato Differential Regulation of Apoptosis in the Corpus Luteum of Pregnancy and Newly Formed Corpus Luteum after Parturition in Rats Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 313 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y.-P. Sun, T. J. Lee, and G. V. Shah Calcitonin Expression in Rat Anterior Pituitary Gland Is Regulated by Ovarian Steroid Hormones Endocrinology, October 1, 2002; 143(10): 4056 - 4064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Gaytan, C. Morales, C. Bellido, and J. E. Sanchez-Criado Selective Apoptosis of Luteal Endothelial Cells in Dexamethasone-Treated Rats Leads to Ischemic Necrosis of Luteal Tissue Biol Reprod, January 1, 2002; 66(1): 232 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
