|
|
||||||||
Regular Article |
a Departments of Gene Expression and Development
b Genomics and Bioinformatics, Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, United Kingdom
c Germplasm and Gamete Physiology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
d Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111
To clone a pig from somatic cells, we first validated an electrical activation method for use on ovulated oocytes. We then evaluated delayed versus simultaneous activation (DA vs. SA) strategies, the use of 2 nuclear donor cells, and the use of cytoskeletal inhibitors during nuclear transfer. Using enucleated ovulated oocytes as cytoplasts for fetal fibroblast nuclei and transferring cloned embryos into a recipient within 2 h of activation, a 2-h delay between electrical fusion and activation yielded blastocysts more reliably and with a higher nuclear count than did SA. Comparable rates of development using DA were obtained following culture of embryos cloned from ovulated or in vitro-matured cytoplasts and fibroblast or cumulus nuclei. Treatment of cloned embryos with cytochalasin B (CB) postfusion and for 6 h after DA had no impact on blastocyst development as compared with CB treatment postfusion only. Inclusion of a microtubule inhibitor such as nocodozole with CB before and after DA improved nuclear retention and favored the formation of single pronuclei in experiments using a membrane dye to reliably monitor fusion. However, no improvement in blastocyst development was observed. Using fetal fibroblasts as nuclear donor cells, a live cloned piglet was produced in a pregnancy that was maintained by cotransfer of parthenogenetic embryos.
1 This work was funded by Geron Bio-Med.
2 Correspondence. FAX: 44 0131 527 4493; ian.wilmut{at}bbsrc.ac.uk
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Popova, M. Bader, and A. Krivokharchenko Full-Term Development of Rat after Transfer of Nuclei from Two-Cell Stage Embryos Biol Reprod, October 1, 2006; 75(4): 524 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kawahara, T. Wakai, K.-I. Yamanaka, J. Kobayashi, S. Sugimura, T. Shimizu, H. Matsumoto, J.-H. Kim, H. Sasada, and E. Sato Caffeine promotes premature chromosome condensation formation and in vitro development in porcine reconstructed embryos via a high level of maturation promoting factor activity during nuclear transfer Reproduction, September 1, 2005; 130(3): 351 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S J Martins da Silva, J O Gardner, J E Taylor, A Springbett, P A De Sousa, and R A Anderson Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes bovine oocyte cytoplasmic competence for embryo development Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 423 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Jiang, D. B. Carter, J. Xu, X. Yang, R. S. Prather, and X. C. Tian Telomere Lengths in Cloned Transgenic Pigs Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1589 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Koh and A. Atala Tissue Engineering, Stem Cells, and Cloning: Opportunities for Regenerative Medicine J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2004; 15(5): 1113 - 1125. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Choi, L. B. Love, M. E. Westhusin, and K. Hinrichs Activation of Equine Nuclear Transfer Oocytes: Methods and Timing of Treatment in Relation to Nuclear Remodeling Biol Reprod, January 1, 2004; 70(1): 46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-W. Lee, S.-C. Wu, X. C. Tian, M. Barber, T. Hoagland, J. Riesen, K.-H. Lee, C.-F. Tu, W. T.K. Cheng, and X. Yang Production of Cloned Pigs by Whole-Cell Intracytoplasmic Microinjection Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 995 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Cogle, S. M. Guthrie, R. C. Sanders, W. L. Allen, E. W. Scott, and B. E. Petersen An Overview of Stem Cell Research and Regulatory Issues Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2003; 78(8): 993 - 1003. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hao, L. Lai, J. Mao, G.-S. Im, A. Bonk, and R. S. Prather Apoptosis and In Vitro Development of Preimplantation Porcine Embryos Derived In Vitro or by Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 501 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gasparrini, S. Gao, A. Ainslie, J. Fletcher, M. McGarry, W.A. Ritchie, A.J. Springbett, E.W. Overstrom, I. Wilmut, and P.A. De Sousa Cloned Mice Derived from Embryonic Stem Cell Karyoplasts and Activated Cytoplasts Prepared by Induced Enucleation Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1259 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Miyoshi, S. J. Rzucidlo, S. L. Pratt, and S. L. Stice Improvements in Cloning Efficiencies May Be Possible by Increasing Uniformity in Recipient Oocytes and Donor Cells Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1079 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhu, E. E. Telfer, J. Fletcher, A. Springbett, J. R. Dobrinsky, P. A. De Sousa, and I. Wilmut Improvement of an Electrical Activation Protocol for Porcine Oocytes Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 635 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |