|
|
||||||||
Regular Article |
a Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
b Research Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, TUBITAK, Gebze, Kocaeli 41470, Turkey
c Prolinia Inc., Athens, Georgia 30602
This study examined bovine cloning strategies that may be used for gene targeting in animals of known phenotypic traits. Fibroblast cells derived from an adult and a fetus of the same genotype were transfected with a plasmid (pEGFP-N1) containing the enhanced green fluorescence protein and neomycin-resistant genes. After transfecting 2 x 105 cells, 49 adult and 35 fetal cell colonies were obtained. Green fluorescence expression was observed in 35 out of 49 (71.4%) adult clones and in 30 out of 35 (85.7%) fetal clones. Developmental rates to the blastocyst stage following nuclear transfer (NT) did not differ among nontransfected cell lines (adult, 20.0%; NT fetal, 18.3%), whereas developmental rates were significantly lower for adult and fetal cell lines expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP; 11.3% and 6.4%, respectively, P < 0.05). However, there was no decrease in NT developmental rates (19.8%) when donor nuclei from EGFP-transfected cell lines not expressing EGFP but retaining neomycin-resistant gene expression were used as donor nuclei. NT embryos from adult and fetal cell lines had similar morphology, cell number, and ploidy. The results indicated that adult and NT fetal cells (identical genotype) can complete clonal propagation, including transfection and selection, and can be used to produce transgenic NT embryos; however, a possible deleterious effect of EGFP on embryo development should be considered in future gene targeting studies.
1 Supported in part by AT Children's Project and Prolinia Inc.
2 Correspondence: Steven L. Stice, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, 425 River Road, Athens, GA 30602. FAX: 706 542 7925; sstice{at}arches.uga.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Giraldo, D. A. Hylan, C. B. Ballard, M. N. Purpera, T. D. Vaught, J. W. Lynn, R. A. Godke, and K. R. Bondioli Effect of Epigenetic Modifications of Donor Somatic Cells on the Subsequent Chromatin Remodeling of Cloned Bovine Embryos Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 832 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bosch, S. L. Pratt, and S. L. Stice Isolation, Characterization, Gene Modification, and Nuclear Reprogramming of Porcine Mesenchymal Stem Cells Biol Reprod, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 46 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Watanabe, M. Iwamoto, S.-i. Suzuki, D. Fuchimoto, D. Honma, T. Nagai, M. Hashimoto, S. Yazaki, M. Sato, and A. Onishi A Novel Method for the Production of Transgenic Cloned Pigs: Electroporation-Mediated Gene Transfer to Non-Cultured Cells and Subsequent Selection with Puromycin Biol Reprod, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 309 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.M. Powell, N.C. Talbot, K.D. Wells, D.E. Kerr, V.G. Pursel, and R.J. Wall Cell Donor Influences Success of Producing Cattle by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G-P Li, K L White, K I Aston, L N Meerdo, and T D Bunch Conditioned medium increases the polyploid cell composition of bovine somatic cell nuclear-transferred blastocysts Reproduction, February 1, 2004; 127(2): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bordignon, R. Keyston, A. Lazaris, A. S. Bilodeau, J. H.F. Pontes, D. Arnold, G. Fecteau, C. Keefer, and L. C. Smith Transgene Expression of Green Fluorescent Protein and Germ Line Transmission in Cloned Calves Derived from In Vitro-Transfected Somatic Cells Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2013 - 2023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |