Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dhont, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dhont, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dhont, M.
Biology of Reproduction 67, 575-579 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Fertilization of Mouse Oocytes from In Vitro-Matured Preantral Follicles Using Classical In Vitro Fertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection1

Jun Liu2,a, Andrei Rybouchkina, Josiane Van der Elsta, and Marc Dhonta

a Infertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

Early preantral mouse follicles with a diameter of 110–160 µm were cultured in vitro for 10 or 12 days. Mature oocytes were retrieved following hCG, and fertilization was attempted either by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Two-cell and blastocyst formation rates and blastocyst cell numbers were compared between 10-day and 12-day in vitro-matured oocytes versus in vivo-matured oocytes. Uncleaved IVF oocytes were subjected to chromosome analysis. The 2-cell formation rate was significantly improved by ICSI compared with IVF both in 10-day (72.1% versus 56.1%; P = 0.03) and 12-day cultures (74.1% versus 54.5%; P = 0.028). Cytogenetic analysis of uncleaved MII oocytes following IVF showed that about 30% of MII oocytes showed no sign of sperm penetration. The blastocyst formation rate was significantly lower in 12-day versus 10-day cultures, whether fertilization was by IVF (40.7% versus 62.4%, P = 0.016) or by ICSI (32.5% versus 57.1%, P = 0.035). Blastocyst cell numbers from IVF and ICSI 10-day groups were similar and both significantly higher (P < 0.001) than from IVF 12-day cultures. All above expressed values were significantly higher for in vivo-matured oocytes. In conclusion, fertilization of oocytes from in vitro-matured mouse preantral follicles can be optimized with ICSI, giving significantly higher 2-cell formation rates than IVF. Blastocyst formation rate was not influenced by the technique of fertilization but rather by the extent of the in vitro culture period. Best results on preimplantation development of oocytes for in vitro-matured preantral follicles were obtained with ICSI on oocytes from 10-day in vitro cultures.

First decision: 24 September 2001.

1 Supported by research grant BOF01112199 from the Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds of the Ghent University, Belgium.

2 Correspondence: Jun Liu, Infertility Center, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. FAX: 32 9 240 4972; jun.liu{at}rug.ac.be




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Soleimani, J. Van der Elst, E. Heytens, R. Van den Broecke, J. Gerris, M. Dhont, C. Cuvelier, and P. De Sutter
Back muscle as a promising site for ovarian tissue transplantation, an animal model
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 619 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Takeuchi, Z. Rosenwaks, and G. D. Palermo
A successful model to assess embryo development after transplantation of prophase nuclei
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 975 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.