|
|
||||||||
Regular Article |
a Comparative Medicine Center, Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211
b Cryobiology Research Institute, Wells Research Center, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
Successful cryopreservation requires cells to tolerate volume excursions experienced during permeating cryoprotectant equilibration and during cooling and warming. However, prior studies have demonstrated that mouse spermatozoa are extremely sensitive to osmotically induced volume changes. A series of three experiments were conducted 1) to test the efficacy of two commonly used extender media components, egg yolk (EY) and skim milk (SM), in broadening the osmotic tolerance limits (OTL) of ICR and B6C3F1 murine spermatozoa; 2) to determine if the extender components affected sperm plasma membrane permeability coefficients for water and cryoprotective agent (CPA) characteristics; and 3) to test the effects of permeating and nonpermeating CPA on mouse sperm morphology. In experiment 1, sperm samples were added to 150, 225, 300, 450, or 600 mOsm NaCl, EY, SM, sucrose, or choline chloride at 22°C and then returned to isosmotic conditions. In experiment 2, epididymal sperm were preequilibrated in 1 M glycerol (Gly) or 2 M ethylene glycol (EG) prepared in SM extender, abruptly exposed to isosmotic conditions at 22, 15, or 2°C, and the corresponding volume excursions were measured and analyzed. In experiment 3, the effects of permeating CPA (0.3 M EG or dimethyl sulfoxide) or nonpermeating CPA (12% sucrose or 18% raffinose) on sperm morphology (i.e., principle midpiece folding and putative membrane fusion) were evaluated. Experiment 1 showed that spermatozoa from ICR and B6C3F1 mice have effectively broader OTL when exposed to EY or SM extenders. The results of experiment 2 indicated that, for ICR sperm, the activation energy (Ea) for the hydraulic conductivity (Lp) was unchanged in SM extender. However, for B6C3F1 sperm, there were significant differences in Ea of Lp in the presence of Gly and EG. The result of experiment 3 indicated that permeating CPAs damage sperm membrane integrity, causing a high frequency of head-to-tail or tail-to-tail membrane fusion, whereas this occurrence in the presence of nonpermeating CPA was less than 3%. Finally, the results of experiments 1 and 2 were combined in a mathematical model to predict Gly and EG addition and removal in the presence of SM extender, which would prevent mouse sperm membrane damage. These predictions indicated that, for ICR sperm, both Gly and EG may be added and removed in a single step. However, for B6C3F1 spermatozoa, Gly required a two-step addition while EG only required a single step. For removal from B6C3F1 sperm, Gly required a three-step removal process while EG required a two-step removal.
2 Correspondence: John K. Critser, Comparative Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 1600 East Rollins Street, Room E-109, Columbia, MO 65211. FAX: 573 884 7521; critserj{at}missouri.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Si, H. Men, J. D Benson, and J. K Critser Osmotic characteristics and fertility of murine spermatozoa collected in different solutions Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Varisli, C. Uguz, C. Agca, and Y. Agca Various Physical Stress Factors on Rat Sperm Motility, Integrity of Acrosome, and Plasma Membrane J Androl, January 1, 2009; 30(1): 75 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T G Cooper, J P Barfield, and C H Yeung The tonicity of murine epididymal spermatozoa and their permeability towards common cryoprotectants and epididymal osmolytes Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 625 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamauchi, A. Ajduk, J. M Riel, and M. A Ward Ejaculated and Epididymal Mouse Spermatozoa Are Different in Their Susceptibility to Nuclease-Dependent DNA Damage and in Their Nuclease Activity Biol Reprod, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 636 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yildiz, P. Ottaviani, N. Law, R. Ayearst, L. Liu, and C. McKerlie Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro embryo development in the mouse Reproduction, March 1, 2007; 133(3): 585 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ajduk, Y. Yamauchi, and M. A Ward Sperm Chromatin Remodeling after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Differs from That of In Vitro Fertilization Biol Reprod, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 442 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Agca, J. Liu, S. Mullen, J. Johnson-Ward, K. Gould, A. Chan, and J. Critser Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) Spermatozoa Osmotic Tolerance and Cryoprotectant Permeability Characteristics J Androl, July 1, 2005; 26(4): 470 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Ward, T. Kaneko, H. Kusakabe, J. D. Biggers, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi Long-Term Preservation of Mouse Spermatozoa after Freeze-Drying and Freezing Without Cryoprotection Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2100 - 2108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |