Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Agca, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Biology of Reproduction 67, 1493-1501 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Osmotic Characteristics of Mouse Spermatozoa in the Presence of Extenders and Sugars1

Yuksel Agcaa, Julie Gilmoreb, Michael Byersb, Erik J. Woodsb, Jun Liua, and John K. Critser2,a

a Comparative Medicine Center, Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 b Cryobiology Research Institute, Wells Research Center, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202

Successful cryopreservation requires cells to tolerate volume excursions experienced during permeating cryoprotectant equilibration and during cooling and warming. However, prior studies have demonstrated that mouse spermatozoa are extremely sensitive to osmotically induced volume changes. A series of three experiments were conducted 1) to test the efficacy of two commonly used extender media components, egg yolk (EY) and skim milk (SM), in broadening the osmotic tolerance limits (OTL) of ICR and B6C3F1 murine spermatozoa; 2) to determine if the extender components affected sperm plasma membrane permeability coefficients for water and cryoprotective agent (CPA) characteristics; and 3) to test the effects of permeating and nonpermeating CPA on mouse sperm morphology. In experiment 1, sperm samples were added to 150, 225, 300, 450, or 600 mOsm NaCl, EY, SM, sucrose, or choline chloride at 22°C and then returned to isosmotic conditions. In experiment 2, epididymal sperm were preequilibrated in 1 M glycerol (Gly) or 2 M ethylene glycol (EG) prepared in SM extender, abruptly exposed to isosmotic conditions at 22, 15, or 2°C, and the corresponding volume excursions were measured and analyzed. In experiment 3, the effects of permeating CPA (0.3 M EG or dimethyl sulfoxide) or nonpermeating CPA (12% sucrose or 18% raffinose) on sperm morphology (i.e., principle midpiece folding and putative membrane fusion) were evaluated. Experiment 1 showed that spermatozoa from ICR and B6C3F1 mice have effectively broader OTL when exposed to EY or SM extenders. The results of experiment 2 indicated that, for ICR sperm, the activation energy (Ea) for the hydraulic conductivity (Lp) was unchanged in SM extender. However, for B6C3F1 sperm, there were significant differences in Ea of Lp in the presence of Gly and EG. The result of experiment 3 indicated that permeating CPAs damage sperm membrane integrity, causing a high frequency of head-to-tail or tail-to-tail membrane fusion, whereas this occurrence in the presence of nonpermeating CPA was less than 3%. Finally, the results of experiments 1 and 2 were combined in a mathematical model to predict Gly and EG addition and removal in the presence of SM extender, which would prevent mouse sperm membrane damage. These predictions indicated that, for ICR sperm, both Gly and EG may be added and removed in a single step. However, for B6C3F1 spermatozoa, Gly required a two-step addition while EG only required a single step. For removal from B6C3F1 sperm, Gly required a three-step removal process while EG required a two-step removal.

1 This work was supported by the Cryobiology Research Institute and grants from the NIH (R24-RR13194 and U42 RR14821).

2 Correspondence: John K. Critser, Comparative Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 1600 East Rollins Street, Room E-109, Columbia, MO 65211. FAX: 573 884 7521; critserj{at}missouri.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
W. Si, H. Men, J. D Benson, and J. K Critser
Osmotic characteristics and fertility of murine spermatozoa collected in different solutions
Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
O. Varisli, C. Uguz, C. Agca, and Y. Agca
Various Physical Stress Factors on Rat Sperm Motility, Integrity of Acrosome, and Plasma Membrane
J Androl, January 1, 2009; 30(1): 75 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T G Cooper, J P Barfield, and C H Yeung
The tonicity of murine epididymal spermatozoa and their permeability towards common cryoprotectants and epididymal osmolytes
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 625 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yamauchi, A. Ajduk, J. M Riel, and M. A Ward
Ejaculated and Epididymal Mouse Spermatozoa Are Different in Their Susceptibility to Nuclease-Dependent DNA Damage and in Their Nuclease Activity
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 636 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
C. Yildiz, P. Ottaviani, N. Law, R. Ayearst, L. Liu, and C. McKerlie
Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro embryo development in the mouse
Reproduction, March 1, 2007; 133(3): 585 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Ajduk, Y. Yamauchi, and M. A Ward
Sperm Chromatin Remodeling after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Differs from That of In Vitro Fertilization
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 442 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Y. Agca, J. Liu, S. Mullen, J. Johnson-Ward, K. Gould, A. Chan, and J. Critser
Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) Spermatozoa Osmotic Tolerance and Cryoprotectant Permeability Characteristics
J Androl, July 1, 2005; 26(4): 470 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A. Ward, T. Kaneko, H. Kusakabe, J. D. Biggers, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Long-Term Preservation of Mouse Spermatozoa after Freeze-Drying and Freezing Without Cryoprotection
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2100 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.