Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 4, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.005694
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
67/6/1853    most recent
biolreprod.102.005694v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, X.
Biology of Reproduction 67, 1853-1863 (2002)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.005694 © 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Gamete Biology

Hypertonicity-Induced Projections Reflect Cell Polarity in Mouse Metaphase II Oocytes: Involvement of Microtubules, Microfilaments, and Chromosomes1

Ji-Long Liua, Li-Ying Sunga, X. Cindy Tiana, and Xiangzhong Yang2,a

a Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269

A previous study showed that with hypertonic sucrose treatment, a projection is formed in mouse metaphase II (MII) oocytes in proximity to the spindle and chromosomes, where a polarized cortical domain is located. However, little is known about the mechanisms involved in this process. Here, we designed a series of experiments to test the hypothesis that hypertonicity is the induction factor for the formation of projections in mouse MII oocytes. Our hypothesis was supported by the following evidence: 1) different concentrations of sucrose affected the formation and shape of projections, whereas serum or basic media had little effect; 2) other hypertonic sugar solutions could also induce projection formation; and 3) projections could also be induced by hypertonic NaCl solution. We then tested the hypothesis that the cytoskeleton was involved in the formation of hypertonicity-induced projections. This was investigated by culturing MII- and germinal vesicle-stage mouse oocytes in the presence or absence of cytoskeletal inhibitors, including cytochalasin B (disruption of actin filaments), nocodazole (disruption of microtubules), and taxol (polymerization of tubulin molecules). We found that none of the cytoskeletal inhibitors alone could prevent hypertonicity-induced projection formation, whereas the combination of cytochalasin B with nocodazole or with taxol blocked the formation of these projections in most matured oocytes. When immature oocytes were incubated in cytochalasin B, but not in nocodazole or taxol, the formation of an actin-rich domain and the peripheral positioning of the spindle were blocked during maturation; hence, no projections were formed, even after hypertonic sucrose treatment. Based on these observations, we propose that three components are necessary for projection formation: 1) a polarized cortical patch (e.g., an actin-rich domain), 2) rigid submembrane structures (e.g., a spindle and/or chromosomes), and 3) solid connections between the above. Any disturbance of one of these factors will affect the hypertonicity-induced projection formation. Hypertonicity-induced projection in mouse oocytes thus provides an experimental model for studies regarding cell polarity and the interaction between membrane and submembrane components.

1 Funded in part by grants from Connecticut Innovations, Inc. and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (01-03333) to X.Y. and X.C.T. This paper is a scientific contribution (no. 2083) of the Storrs Experimental Station of the University of Connecticut.

2 Correspondence: X. Jerry Yang, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, 1390 Storrs Rd., U-163, Storrs, CT 06269-4163.> FAX: 860 486 0534; jyang{at}canr.uconn.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Q.-Y. Sun and H. Schatten
Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization
Reproduction, February 1, 2006; 131(2): 193 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.-L. Liu, H. Kusakabe, C.-C. Chang, H. Suzuki, D. W. Schmidt, M. Julian, R. Pfeffer, C. L. Bormann, X. C. Tian, R. Yanagimachi, et al.
Freeze-Dried Sperm Fertilization Leads to Full-Term Development in Rabbits
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1776 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C.-C. Chang, Z. P. Nagy, R. Abdelmassih, X. Yang, and X. C. Tian
Nuclear and Microtubule Dynamics of G2/M Somatic Nuclei During Haploidization in Germinal Vesicle-Stage Mouse Oocytes
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 752 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.