HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 68/1/159    most recent biolreprod.102.008201v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hiendleder, S. Articles by Wolf, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hiendleder, S. Articles by Wolf, E. Agricola Articles by Hiendleder, S. Articles by Wolf, E.

Heteroplasmy in Bovine Fetuses Produced by Intra- and Inter-Subspecific Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Neutral Segregation of Nuclear Donor Mitochondrial DNA in Various Tissues and Evidence for Recipient Cow Mitochondria in Fetal Blood¹

^a Department of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany ^b Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics and Central Biotechnical Unit Strahlenzentrum, Justus-Liebig-University, D-35392 Giessen, Germany ^c Bavarian Research Center for Biology of Reproduction (BFZF), D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany ^d Bavarian Research Station for Animal Breeding, D-85586 Grub, Germany ^e Agrobiogen GmbH, D-86567 Hilgertshausen, Germany

Varying degrees of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) heteroplasmy have been observed in nuclear transfer embryos, fetuses, and offspring, but the mechanisms leading to this condition are unknown. We have generated a clone of 12 bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer fetuses, using nuclear donor cells, recipient oocytes, and recipient heifers with defined mtDNA genotypes, to study nuclear-mitochondrial interactions and the origins of mtDNA heteroplasmy. Embryos were reconstructed from granulosa cells with Bos taurus mtDNA type A and recipient oocytes collected from three different maternal lineages with B. taurus mtDNA type B, B. taurus mtDNA type C, or B. indicus mtDNA. Sequence differences in the control region (CR) of B. taurus mtDNAs ranged from 6 to 11 nucleotides and differences between B. taurus and B. indicus CRs from 45 to 50 nucleotides. Fetuses were recovered from recipient heifers with B. taurus mtDNA type B on Day 80 after nuclear transfer (eight B. taurus A/B, two B. taurus A/C, and two B. taurus A/B. indicus). Agarose gel analysis of the CR by polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism failed to detect nuclear donor mtDNA in 11 investigated tissues of 10 viable fetuses and in DNA samples of two fetuses in resorption (one B. taurus A/B and one B. taurus A/C). A more sensitive analysis of 1801 plasmid clones with CR inserts derived from tissues of a B. taurus A/B. indicus fetus detected no or very low levels of heteroplasmy (0.5–0.7%). However, the analyses detected considerable amounts (2.5% and 5%) of recipient heifer mtDNA in blood samples from two fetuses. Our data do not suggest a replicative advantage of somatic nuclear donor cell mtDNA in bovine transmitochondrial clones produced with oocytes from domestic forms of the same or a different aurochs (B. primigenius) subspecies. Detection of mtDNA from the recipient animal in the circulation of two fetuses points to leakage of the placental barrier, mimicking heteroplasmy.

¹ Supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HI 503/3-1, WO 685/3-1).

² Correspondence: Stefan Hiendleder, Department of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Hackerstrasse 27, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.FAX: 49 89 315 2799; s.hiendleder{at}gen.vetmed.uni-muenchen.de

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E.C. Spikings, J. Alderson, and J.C.St. John Transmission of mitochondrial DNA following assisted reproduction and nuclear transfer Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 401 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. J. Hall, P. Stojkovic, and M. Stojkovic Using Therapeutic Cloning to Fight Human Disease: A Conundrum or Reality? Stem Cells, July 1, 2006; 24(7): 1628 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-H. Sun, S.-P. Chen, Y.-P. Wang, W. Hu, and Z.-Y. Zhu Cytoplasmic Impact on Cross-Genus Cloned Fish Derived from Transgenic Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Nuclei and Goldfish (Carassius auratus) Enucleated Eggs Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 510 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C St John, R. E I Lloyd, E. J Bowles, E. C Thomas, and S. El Shourbagy The consequences of nuclear transfer for mammalian foetal development and offspring survival. A mitochondrial DNA perspective Reproduction, June 1, 2004; 127(6): 631 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hiendleder, K. Prelle, K. Bruggerhoff, H.-D. Reichenbach, H. Wenigerkind, D. Bebbere, M. Stojkovic, S. Muller, G. Brem, V. Zakhartchenko, et al. Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Interactions Affect In Utero Developmental Capacity, Phenotype, and Cellular Metabolism of Bovine Nuclear Transfer Fetuses Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1196 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]