Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 14, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.007039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/1/45    most recent
biolreprod.102.007039v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peura, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peura, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Peura, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S. K.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 45–50 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.007039
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Reproductive Technology

Effect of Nutrition of Oocyte Donor on the Outcomes of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Sheep1

Teija T. Peura2,a, David O. Kleemanna, Skye R. Rudigera, Greg S. Nattrassb, Clive J. McLaughlanb, and Simon K. Walkera

a South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) Reproduction Laboratory, Turretfield Research Centre, Rosedale, SA 5350, Australia b South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) Molecular Biology Laboratory, Glenside, SA 5065, Australia

The purpose of this study was to determine if the nutrition of the oocyte donor ewe influenced the success of somatic cell cloning. Merino ewes were fed at either a high- or a low-nutrition level for 3–5 mo before superovulation treatments. Freshly ovulated oocytes were enucleated and fused with serum-starved adult granulosa cells, and resulting reconstructed embryos were cultured for 6 days in modified synthetic oviduct fluid. Embryo cleavage and development to blastocysts were recorded, and good-quality embryos were transferred to synchronized recipient ewes either fresh or, on a few occasions, after vitrification. Pregnancies were monitored by ultrasonography from Day 40 of pregnancy, and offspring were delivered by either cesarean section or vaginal delivery. No differences occurred in the numbers of follicles aspirated, of oocytes recovered, or of oocytes utilizable for cloning between the high and low groups. Neither were there treatment differences in development to the blastocyst stage. However, transfer of embryos from the high group led to significantly more pregnancies and implanted fetuses. Also, more of the established pregnancies from the high group were carried to term, although this difference was not statistically significant. Lamb mortality was high, with half the live-born perishing soon after birth and more succumbing to various infections within days or weeks of birth, but no clear association between the offspring fate and the treatment group could be established. These results suggest that more research into the effect of nutrition on oocyte quality and its subsequent effect on cloning is warranted.

1 This work was part of a collaborative research effort with The Grange/Multiplex Constructions Pty., whose financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

2 Correspondence. FAX: 61 8 8524 9088; peura.teija{at}saugov.sa.gov.au




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. Borowczyk, J. S. Caton, D. A. Redmer, J. J. Bilski, R. M. Weigl, K. A. Vonnahme, P. P. Borowicz, J. D. Kirsch, K. C. Kraft, L. P. Reynolds, et al.
Effects of plane of nutrition on in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development in sheep
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1593 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.