Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 17, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008474
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/2/524    most recent
biolreprod.102.008474v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Bergfelt, D.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Bergfelt, D.R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ginther, O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Bergfelt, D.R.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 524–529 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008474
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

Associated and Independent Comparisons Between the Two Largest Follicles Preceding Follicle Deviation in Cattle1

O.J. Ginther2,a, M.A. Bega, K. Kota, C. Meira3,a, and D.R. Bergfelta

a Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, Wisconsin 53528

Follicle diameters and concentrations of follicular fluid factors were studied in the two largest follicles (F1 and F2) using F1 diameters in increments of 0.2 mm (equivalent to 4 h intervals) and extending from 7.4 to 8.4 mm (12 heifers in each of 6 groups). Changes were compared between follicles using the F2 associated with each F1-diameter group. Diameter deviation began in the 8.2-mm group as indicated by a greater (P < 0.05) diameter difference between F1 and F2 in the 8.4-mm group than in the 8.2-mm group. In the 8.0-mm group, estradiol concentrations began to increase (P < 0.05) differentially in F1 versus F2, and free insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) began to decrease differentially in F2 (P < 0.06). Combined for F1 and the associated F2, activin-A concentrations increased (P < 0.05) between the 7.6- and 8.2-mm groups and then decreased (P < 0.05). Results supported the hypothesis that estradiol and free IGF-1 concentrations simultaneously become higher in F1 than in the associated F2 by the beginning of diameter deviation. Results did not support the hypothesis that a transient elevation in activin-A is present in F1 but not in the associated F2 at the beginning of the estradiol and IGF-1 changes; instead, a mean transient elevation in activin-A occurred at this time only when data for the two follicles were combined. Comparisons between F1 and F2 also were made by independently grouping F2 and using diameter groups at 0.2-mm increments for F2 as well as for F1. In the diameter groups common to F1 and F2 (7.4, 7.6, 7.8, and 8.0 mm) there was a group effect (P < 0.003) for estradiol involving an increase (P < 0.05) beginning at the 7.6-mm group averaged over F1 and F2. For free IGF-1 concentrations, a fluctuation (a significant increase followed by a significant decrease) occurred independently in F1 between the 7.4- to 7.8-mm groups and independently in F2 between the 7.0- to 7.4-mm groups.

1 Research supported by the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and by the Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, WI.

2 Correspondence: O.J. Ginther, Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, 1656 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706. FAX: 608 262 7420; ojg{at}ahabs.wisc.edu

3 C.M. is on leave from the Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science-UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M A Beg and O J Ginther
Follicle selection in cattle and horses: role of intrafollicular factors.
Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 365 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L. J. Spicer
Proteolytic Degradation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins by Ovarian Follicles: A Control Mechanism for Selection of Dominant Follicles
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1223 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
O.J. Ginther, D.R. Bergfelt, M.A. Beg, C. Meira, and K. Kot
In Vivo Effects of an Intrafollicular Injection of Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 on the Mechanism of Follicle Deviation in Heifers and Mares
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2004; 70(1): 99 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. M. Quirk, R. G. Cowan, R. M. Harman, C.-L. Hu, and D. A. Porter
Ovarian follicular growth and atresia: The relationship between cell proliferation and survival
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E40 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. M. Rivera and J. E. Fortune
Proteolysis of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins -4 and -5 in Bovine Follicular Fluid: Implications for Ovarian Follicular Selection and Dominance
Endocrinology, July 1, 2003; 144(7): 2977 - 2987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.